Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1371326
| From | Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC] sched: unused cpu in affine workload |
| Date | 2016-04-05 11:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rkv05-sF-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <rk8ZA-Wy-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <rk99g-118-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <rkcJP-3AF-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rkiFA-89A-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rkko3-VB-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 11:34:50PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 03:45:16PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote: > > An optimal solution is NP hard. > > > > Heuristics that "move tasks with pressure" may be > > much more doable, and lead to perfectly satisfactory > > results, especially if most migrations happen within > > a socket (and the same shared L3 cache). > > Right; trick will be finding something that mostly works without making > the regular balance paths increase in complexity. > > As per the argument in kernel/sched/fair.c:5694 the current > load-balancing averages out to O(n), and I would very much like to keep > it that way. guys, thanks a lot for all the thoughts and suggestions, I'll try to come up with something jirka
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC] sched: unused cpu in affine workload Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> - 2016-04-04 10:30 +0200
Re: [RFC] sched: unused cpu in affine workload Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-04-04 10:50 +0200
Re: [RFC] sched: unused cpu in affine workload Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-04-04 11:00 +0200
Re: [RFC] sched: unused cpu in affine workload Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-04-04 11:30 +0200
Re: [RFC] sched: unused cpu in affine workload Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-04-04 11:40 +0200
Re: [RFC] sched: unused cpu in affine workload Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-04-04 15:30 +0200
Re: [RFC] sched: unused cpu in affine workload Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> - 2016-04-04 21:50 +0200
Re: [RFC] sched: unused cpu in affine workload Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-04-04 23:40 +0200
Re: [RFC] sched: unused cpu in affine workload Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> - 2016-04-05 11:00 +0200
csiph-web