Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1372488
| From | Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PART1 RFC v3 12/12] svm: Manage vcpu load/unload when enable AVIC |
| Date | 2016-04-06 14:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rkUUx-3Mo-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <riLC2-6ib-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <riLC2-6ib-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <rkACv-5ln-49@gated-at.bofh.it> <rkACv-5ln-47@gated-at.bofh.it> <rkUUx-3Mo-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
2016-04-06 10:40+0700, Suravee Suthikulpanit:
> On 04/05/2016 09:56 PM, Radim Krčmář wrote:
>>I meant to change the place where we remember that is_running must not
>>be true. Something like
>>
>> svm_vcpu_blocking(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu):
>> vcpu->is_blocking = true;
>> avic_set_running(vcpu, false);
>>
>> avic_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_load):
>> avic_set_running(vcpu, is_load && !vcpu->is_blocking)
>
> I assume that you also imply that we would also need:
>
> svm_vcpu_unblocking(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {
> avic_set_running(vcpu, false);
> vcpu->is_blocking = false;
> }
Yes, thought the order should be flipped in order to avoid suboptimal
case when preemption hits us after avic_set_running().
static void svm_vcpu_unblocking(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {
vcpu->is_blocking = false;
avic_set_running(vcpu, true);
}
avic_set_running has barriers that prevent GCC from harmful reordering.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PART1 RFC v3 12/12] svm: Manage vcpu load/unload when enable AVIC Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com> - 2016-04-05 17:00 +0200 Re: [PART1 RFC v3 12/12] svm: Manage vcpu load/unload when enable AVIC Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com> - 2016-04-06 14:40 +0200
csiph-web