Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1371852

Re: [PATCH 3/3] spi: rockchip: check requesting dma channel with EPROBE_DEFER

From Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 3/3] spi: rockchip: check requesting dma channel with EPROBE_DEFER
Date 2016-04-05 20:10 +0200
Message-ID <rkDAm-864-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <raHFf-5dq-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rfhAu-4hg-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <rfjVE-67W-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <rfkoG-6ju-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rfkI1-6rz-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:53:21AM +0800, Shawn Lin wrote:
> >Strange, but on 4.4 there was some extra code in
> >dma_request_slave_channel() that wasn't in
> >dma_request_slave_channel_reason().  ...but looks like that all got
> >cleaned up in the same CL that added the new name.
> 
> dma_request_chan already return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER), but
> dma_request_slave_channel ignore this and rewrite it to be NULL.
> Strange behaviour looks to me. commit 0ad7c00057dc ("dma: add channel
> request API that supports deferred probe")  did the right thing, but
> what happened then?  It was drop for some reasons?
> 
> Hello Vinod,
> 
> Could you please elaborate some more infomation to commit 0ad7c00057dc
> ("dma: add channel request API that supports deferred probe") :) ?

The request API was cleaned up here and please see the Documentation on how
to do this.

See the commit a8135d0d7 - dmaengine: core: Introduce new, universal API to
request a channel

Thanks
-- 
~Vinod

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH 3/3] spi: rockchip: check requesting dma channel with  EPROBE_DEFER Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> - 2016-04-05 20:10 +0200

csiph-web