Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1370327
| From | Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] ARM: start to move arch/arm/mach-* to arch/arm/platforms/* |
| Date | 2016-04-04 04:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rk1Y5-3Vj-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rjRvI-4QL-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rjUWC-7zj-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Russell, 2016-04-04 3:25 GMT+09:00 Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>: > On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 11:39:18PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: >> We have growing number of mach-* directories in arch/arm, and I guess >> it might be a good time to discuss moving them into a sub-directory. > > What does it buy us? Let me summarise the actual change: > > - Move up to 71 arch/arm/mach-* directories to arch/arm/platforms/*, > which just means another level of directory structure. We still > end up with up to 71 directories in arch/arm/platforms/ True, but we can separate non-SoC directories (kernel/, mm/, configs/, etc.) from mach- directories, at least. > - The ability to use obj-y rather than machine-y, where both already > work in the same way. Yes, but Kbuild standard Makefiles might provide more flexible directory structures to tidy up similar SoC families from the same vendor. For example, arch/arm/platforms/samsung/ arch/arm/platforms/samsung/exynos/ arch/arm/platforms/samsung/s3c64xx/ instead of arch/arm/plat-samsung/ arch/arm/mach-exynos/ arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/ I am missing something, though. > Is there anything I missed? > > If that is all, then I really do not like this change - it's seems > to be churn for no benefit, and that's something we really should be > minimising. Linus Torvalds has historically moaned at the ARM > architecture for stuff like this. OK. -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC PATCH 0/9] ARM: start to move arch/arm/mach-* to arch/arm/platforms/* Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> - 2016-04-03 16:50 +0200
[RFC PATCH 9/9] ARM: bcm: move mach-bcm/ to platforms/bcm/ Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> - 2016-04-03 16:50 +0200
[RFC PATCH 2/9] ARM: uniphier: move mach-uniphier/ to platforms/uniphier/ Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> - 2016-04-03 16:50 +0200
[RFC PATCH 3/9] ARM: zynq: move mach-zynq/ to platforms/zynq/ Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> - 2016-04-03 16:50 +0200
[RFC PATCH 1/9] ARM: prepare arch/arm/platforms for immigration Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> - 2016-04-03 16:50 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] ARM: start to move arch/arm/mach-* to arch/arm/platforms/* Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> - 2016-04-03 20:30 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] ARM: start to move arch/arm/mach-* to arch/arm/platforms/* Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 04:00 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] ARM: start to move arch/arm/mach-* to arch/arm/platforms/* Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> - 2016-04-04 04:00 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] ARM: start to move arch/arm/mach-* to arch/arm/platforms/* Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> - 2016-04-04 21:10 +0200
csiph-web