Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1369991
| From | James Bottomley <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] scsi: Add intermediate STARGET_REMOVE state to scsi_target_state |
| Date | 2016-04-02 18:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rjwKD-6wn-31@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <riKmC-5a4-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <riKmC-5a4-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, 2016-03-31 at 14:53 +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > Add intermediate STARGET_REMOVE state to scsi_target_state to avoid > running > into the BUG_ON() in scsi_target_reap(). > > This intermediate state is only valid in the path from > scsi_remove_target() to > scsi_target_destroy() indicating this target is going to be removed. > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> > Fixes: 40998193560dab6c3ce8d25f4fa58a23e252ef38 The code and ordering is fine with me, so you can add Reviewed-by: James Bottomley <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> However, I'd really appreciate it if the description of what was going on was clearer for a non-SUSE distro maintainer. What we're doing is applying a more comprehensive fix for a previously hack fixed problem and then reverting the hack. I think message 1 should say "this refixes the problem introduced by commit X in a more comprehensive way" and message 2 "Now that we've done a more comprehensive fix with the intermediate target state in patch Y, we can remove the previous hack" James
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v3 1/2] scsi: Add intermediate STARGET_REMOVE state to scsi_target_state Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> - 2016-03-31 15:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] scsi: Add intermediate STARGET_REMOVE state to scsi_target_state Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> - 2016-03-31 18:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] scsi: Add intermediate STARGET_REMOVE state to scsi_target_state James Bottomley <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-04-02 18:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] scsi: Add intermediate STARGET_REMOVE state to scsi_target_state Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> - 2016-04-04 11:40 +0200
csiph-web