Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1369139
| From | Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] serial: 8250_dw: fix wrong logic in dw8250_check_lcr() |
| Date | 2016-04-01 12:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rj41Y-2sb-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rj3fA-2as-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | Intel Finland Oy |
On Fri, 2016-04-01 at 17:06 +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> Commit cdcea058e510("serial: 8250_dw: Avoid serial_outx code
> duplicate
> with new dw8250_check_lcr()") introduce a wrong logic when write val
> to
> LCR reg. When CONFIG_64BIT enabled, __raw_writeq is used
> unconditionally.
>
> But for !PORT_OCTEON, we better to use coincident write func.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
> ---
>
> We met following calltrace twice, if the change is not necessary,
> correct me,
> and any advice will be appreciated, thanks.
So, does this fix you issue? If it does than perhaps you need to Cc
stable@ and put Fixes tag as well.
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dw.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dw.c
> @@ -104,15 +104,16 @@ static void dw8250_check_lcr(struct uart_port
> *p, int value)
> dw8250_force_idle(p);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> - __raw_writeq(value & 0xff, offset);
> -#else
> + if (p->type == PORT_OCTEON)
> + __raw_writeq(value & 0xff, offset);
> + else
> +#endif
You may also get rid of this one, like
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT) && p->type == PORT_OCTEON)
...
else if
...
> if (p->iotype == UPIO_MEM32)
> writel(value, offset);
> else if (p->iotype == UPIO_MEM32BE)
> iowrite32be(value, offset);
> else
> writeb(value, offset);
> -#endif
> }
> /*
> * FIXME: this deadlocks if port->lock is already held
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] serial: 8250_dw: fix wrong logic in dw8250_check_lcr() Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> - 2016-04-01 11:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] serial: 8250_dw: fix wrong logic in dw8250_check_lcr() Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> - 2016-04-01 12:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] serial: 8250_dw: fix wrong logic in dw8250_check_lcr() Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> - 2016-04-01 13:30 +0200
csiph-web