Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1367721
| From | Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] elevator: remove second argument in elevator_init() |
| Date | 2016-03-31 02:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <riyOt-4Zm-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qR1Gy-7or-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qVFvJ-1dk-51@gated-at.bofh.it> <rixSp-4h4-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 03/30/2016 05:31 PM, Alexey Klimov wrote: > Hi all, > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 9:01 PM, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> wrote: >> Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> Last user of elevator_init() with non-NULL name as second argument >>> that supposed to be s390 dasd driver has gone few releases ago. >>> Drivers rely on elevator_change(), elevator_switch() and friends >>> for example. Right now elevator_init() is always called as >>> elevator_init(q, NULL). >>> >>> Patch removes passing of second name argument and its usage. >>> >>> While we're at it fix following if-check after removed lines. We know >>> that elevator_type e is initialized by NULL and need to check only >>> chosen_elevator. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@gmail.com> >> >> Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> > > > what is the status of this patch? Is it that wrong and are there some > concerns or do I need to resend it? It looks fine, I'll pick it up for 4.7. -- Jens Axboe
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH] elevator: remove second argument in elevator_init() Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@gmail.com> - 2016-03-31 01:40 +0200 Re: [PATCH] elevator: remove second argument in elevator_init() Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> - 2016-03-31 02:40 +0200
csiph-web