Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1367077
| From | He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | [PATCH] Revert "mm/page_alloc: protect pcp->batch accesses with ACCESS_ONCE" |
| Date | 2016-03-30 12:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rilxT-3RR-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
This reverts commit 998d39cb236fe464af86a3492a24d2f67ee1efc2.
When local irq is disabled, a percpu variable does not change, so we can
remove the access macros and let the compiler optimize the code safely.
Signed-off-by: He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com>
---
mm/page_alloc.c | 10 ++++------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 59de90d..4575b82 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -2015,11 +2015,10 @@ static int rmqueue_bulk(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order,
void drain_zone_pages(struct zone *zone, struct per_cpu_pages *pcp)
{
unsigned long flags;
- int to_drain, batch;
+ int to_drain;
local_irq_save(flags);
- batch = READ_ONCE(pcp->batch);
- to_drain = min(pcp->count, batch);
+ to_drain = min(pcp->count, pcp->batch);
if (to_drain > 0) {
free_pcppages_bulk(zone, to_drain, pcp);
pcp->count -= to_drain;
@@ -2217,9 +2216,8 @@ void free_hot_cold_page(struct page *page, bool cold)
list_add_tail(&page->lru, &pcp->lists[migratetype]);
pcp->count++;
if (pcp->count >= pcp->high) {
- unsigned long batch = READ_ONCE(pcp->batch);
- free_pcppages_bulk(zone, batch, pcp);
- pcp->count -= batch;
+ free_pcppages_bulk(zone, pcp->batch, pcp);
+ pcp->count -= pcp->batch;
}
out:
--
1.8.5.2
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] Revert "mm/page_alloc: protect pcp->batch accesses with ACCESS_ONCE" He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com> - 2016-03-30 12:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] Revert "mm/page_alloc: protect pcp->batch accesses with ACCESS_ONCE" Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> - 2016-03-30 12:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] Revert "mm/page_alloc: protect pcp->batch accesses with ACCESS_ONCE" Hekuang <hekuang@huawei.com> - 2016-03-30 13:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] Revert "mm/page_alloc: protect pcp->batch accesses with ACCESS_ONCE" Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-03-30 13:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] Revert "mm/page_alloc: protect pcp->batch accesses with ACCESS_ONCE" Hekuang <hekuang@huawei.com> - 2016-03-31 03:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] Revert "mm/page_alloc: protect pcp->batch accesses with ACCESS_ONCE" Hekuang <hekuang@huawei.com> - 2016-03-31 03:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] Revert "mm/page_alloc: protect pcp->batch accesses with ACCESS_ONCE" Zefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com> - 2016-03-31 03:50 +0200
csiph-web