Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1367080
| From | "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with Linus' tree |
| Date | 2016-03-30 12:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rilHz-3WZ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rickV-5N1-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 11:32:14AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the rcu tree got a conflict in:
>
> kernel/rcu/tree.c
>
> between commit:
>
> abedf8e2419f ("rcu: Use simple wait queues where possible in rcutree")
>
> from Linus' tree and commit:
>
> 08cace5914ea ("DIAGS: Crude exploratory hack")
>
> from the rcu tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I used the rcu tree version) and can carry the fix as
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.
>
> I really don't think that that rcu tree patch should be in linux-next,
> right?
Right you are! I will rework to get the diagnostics out of your way.
-Might- have helped find one of the bugs, but don't look now...
Thanx, Paul
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-03-30 02:40 +0200 Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with Linus' tree "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-03-30 12:40 +0200
csiph-web