Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1366985
| From | Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 01/11] mm/slab: hold a slab_mutex when calling __kmem_cache_shrink() |
| Date | 2016-03-30 10:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rijw5-2y5-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rhxUt-2rs-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rhxUt-2rs-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rhQaK-6GM-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 07:50:36PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Mon, 28 Mar 2016, js1304@gmail.com wrote: > > > Major kmem_cache metadata in slab subsystem is synchronized with > > the slab_mutex. In SLAB, if some of them is changed, node's shared > > array cache would be freed and re-populated. If __kmem_cache_shrink() > > is called at the same time, it will call drain_array() with n->shared > > without holding node lock so problem can happen. > > > > We can fix this small theoretical race condition by holding node lock > > in drain_array(), but, holding a slab_mutex in kmem_cache_shrink() > > looks more appropriate solution because stable state would make things > > less error-prone and this is not performance critical path. > > Ummm.. The mutex taking is added to common code. So this will also affect > SLUB. The patch needs to consider this. Do we want to force all > allocators to run shrinking only when holding the lock? SLUB does not > need to hold the mutex. And frankly the mutex is for reconfiguration of > metadata which is *not* occurring here. A shrink operation does not do > that. Can we figure out a slab specific way of handling synchronization > in the strange free/realloc cycle? > > It seems that taking the node lock is the appropriate level of > synchrnonization since the concern is with the contents of a shared cache > at that level. There is no change of metadata which would require the > mutex. Okay. I will fix it. Thanks.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 01/11] mm/slab: hold a slab_mutex when calling __kmem_cache_shrink() js1304@gmail.com - 2016-03-28 07:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 01/11] mm/slab: hold a slab_mutex when calling __kmem_cache_shrink() Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> - 2016-03-29 03:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 01/11] mm/slab: hold a slab_mutex when calling __kmem_cache_shrink() Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2016-03-30 10:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 01/11] mm/slab: hold a slab_mutex when calling __kmem_cache_shrink() Nikolay Borisov <kernel@kyup.com> - 2016-03-31 13:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 01/11] mm/slab: hold a slab_mutex when calling __kmem_cache_shrink() Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2016-04-01 04:20 +0200
csiph-web