Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1368687

Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: DT: Add support to scale ramp delay based on platform behavior

From Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: DT: Add support to scale ramp delay based on platform behavior
Date 2016-03-31 22:50 +0200
Message-ID <riRHs-25a-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (5 earlier) <riPZ1-Oc-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <riQ8G-18T-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <riQ8G-18T-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <riQs1-1gf-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <riQV4-1sc-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 01:18:23AM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> On Friday 01 April 2016 12:52 AM, Mark Brown wrote:

> >So why doesn't the device end up configuring 100mV/us when asked for
> >50mv/us?  That's reasonably expected - the configured ramp rate is a
> >maximum rate given that this is used to limit inrush current.

> We did this to adjust device configuration to nearest higher side but this
> is not working well on some of cases.

> On same device, DCDC (SD) rails support 4 ramp configurations, 13.75mV/us,
> 27.5mV/us, 55mV/us and 100mV/us.

> HW team measured the  ramp time at 7.5mV/us when device configured at
> 27.5mV/uS.

> So as per above, it will be adjusted to 13.75mV/us (nearest higher side) for
> device configuration but this device need to configure for 27.5mV/us.

You're saying that the device is so bad at regulating the ramp rate that
it's not only failing to keep up with the desired ramp rate and capping
at whatever rate but it's also doing even worse if configured for a
slower rate?  That's not great, it sounds like it's doing the ramp
control via some sort of dead reckoning thing rather than by actually
ramping the voltage it's trying to regulate like it was asked to.

Is the error in the observed values a function of the capacitance that
we can calcuate here?

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: DT: Add support to scale ramp delay based  on platform behavior Bjorn Andersson <bjorn@kryo.se> - 2016-03-19 05:40 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: DT: Add support to scale ramp delay based  on platform behavior Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-03-19 09:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: DT: Add support to scale ramp delay based  on platform behavior Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-03-30 15:50 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: DT: Add support to scale ramp delay based  on platform behavior Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-03-30 20:20 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: DT: Add support to scale ramp delay based  on platform behavior Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-03-31 09:20 +0200
          Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: DT: Add support to scale ramp delay based  on platform behavior Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-03-31 19:00 +0200
            Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: DT: Add support to scale ramp delay based  on platform behavior Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-03-31 19:30 +0200
              Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: DT: Add support to scale ramp delay based  on platform behavior Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-03-31 19:50 +0200
                Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: DT: Add support to scale ramp delay based  on platform behavior Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-03-31 20:00 +0200
                Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: DT: Add support to scale ramp delay based  on platform behavior Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-03-31 20:40 +0200
                Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: DT: Add support to scale ramp delay based  on platform behavior Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-03-31 20:50 +0200
                Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: DT: Add support to scale ramp delay based  on platform behavior Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-03-31 21:00 +0200
                Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: DT: Add support to scale ramp delay based  on platform behavior Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-03-31 21:10 +0200
                Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: DT: Add support to scale ramp delay based  on platform behavior Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-03-31 21:10 +0200
                Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: DT: Add support to scale ramp delay based  on platform behavior Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-03-31 21:30 +0200
                Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: DT: Add support to scale ramp delay based  on platform behavior Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-03-31 22:00 +0200
                Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: DT: Add support to scale ramp delay based  on platform behavior Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-03-31 22:50 +0200
                Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: DT: Add support to scale ramp delay based  on platform behavior Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-04-01 09:30 +0200
                Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: DT: Add support to scale ramp delay based  on platform behavior Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-04-01 18:20 +0200
                Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: DT: Add support to scale ramp delay based  on platform behavior Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-03-31 20:50 +0200

csiph-web