Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1368098
| From | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/11] introduce down_write_killable for rw_semaphore |
| Date | 2016-03-31 11:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <riHf4-2VE-27@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <r7vAD-38v-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <riovM-64K-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <riGCn-2kC-41@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
* Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> wrote: > On Wed 30-03-16 15:32:17, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 01:58:14PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > I have tested on x86 with OOM situations with high mmap_sem contention > > > (basically many parallel page faults racing with many parallel mmap/munmap > > > tight loops) so the waiters for the write locks are routinely interrupted > > > by SIGKILL. > > > > Aside from the one niggle (as per the other email) they look good to me > > and I would take them through the tip/locking tree. > > Thanks for the review! I understand that tip/locking would be the most > appropriate place [...] Yes. > [...] but I am wondering whether this causes some issues with the follow up > patches which use this new API and which I expect to go via Andrew's tree. So AFAIK Andrew's tree is based on top of linux-next, so once it goes into tip:locking/core, -mm can pick it up as well 1-2 days later. Please send the changes in isolation, for merge into the locking tree. Thanks, Ingo
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 0/11] introduce down_write_killable for rw_semaphore Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-03-30 15:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/11] introduce down_write_killable for rw_semaphore Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-03-31 11:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/11] introduce down_write_killable for rw_semaphore Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-03-31 11:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/11] introduce down_write_killable for rw_semaphore Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-03-31 13:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/11] introduce down_write_killable for rw_semaphore Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-03-31 19:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/11] introduce down_write_killable for rw_semaphore Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-04-01 08:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/11] introduce down_write_killable for rw_semaphore Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-04-01 11:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/11] introduce down_write_killable for rw_semaphore Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-04-01 12:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/11] introduce down_write_killable for rw_semaphore Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-04-01 13:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/11] introduce down_write_killable for rw_semaphore Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-04-01 09:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/11] introduce down_write_killable for rw_semaphore Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-04-01 11:20 +0200
csiph-web