Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1366332
| From | Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 04/12] ARM: dts: dragonboard-600c: add board support with serial |
| Date | 2016-03-29 16:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ri2OC-7x2-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <rfWWZ-8bL-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rfXgm-7y-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rfXJp-n8-35@gated-at.bofh.it> <rg1WF-3mB-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rg2zq-3Dt-41@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed 23 Mar 18:48 PDT 2016, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 03/23/2016 06:04 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Srinivas Kandagatla > > <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> wrote: > >> > >> On 23/03/16 20:07, Stephen Boyd wrote: [..] > > > > Also, if I make a product based of this board, with some minor > > changes, is that still the sbc? > > > > I think the compatible should be "qcom,apq8064-db600c", > > "qcom,apq8064-sbc", "qcom,apq8064" > > > > > > I really hope that people don't keep using the qcom bootloader dtb > picking design if they make a new product based off qcom boards with a > slight variation. They should replace the vendor part of the compatible > anyway with their own vendor prefix, and then the bootloader would need > to be updated to look for that string or something else. I really don't > want to get in the business of updating dtbTool for all the non-qcom > designs that pop up because they keep using the qcom dtb identification > scheme. It almost doesn't scale right now and that's just qcom designs. At that other company the various dtb's that was to be picked for a given product was always to support the various SoC versions; so those devices always shipped with the mtp board-id and msm-id. As far as I've seen this is how Qualcomm's Android customers does it. But as things progress further I do see a need for being able to also pick the right product and at that point you're right that the vendor must change their boot loader. Regards, Bjorn
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 04/12] ARM: dts: dragonboard-600c: add board support with serial Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> - 2016-03-23 20:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 04/12] ARM: dts: dragonboard-600c: add board support with serial Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2016-03-23 21:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 04/12] ARM: dts: dragonboard-600c: add board support with serial Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> - 2016-03-23 21:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 04/12] ARM: dts: dragonboard-600c: add board support with serial Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> - 2016-03-24 02:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 04/12] ARM: dts: dragonboard-600c: add board support with serial Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2016-03-24 02:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 04/12] ARM: dts: dragonboard-600c: add board support with serial Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-03-24 14:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 04/12] ARM: dts: dragonboard-600c: add board support with serial Nicolas Dechesne <nicolas.dechesne@linaro.org> - 2016-03-24 22:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 04/12] ARM: dts: dragonboard-600c: add board support with serial Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2016-03-29 21:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 04/12] ARM: dts: dragonboard-600c: add board support with serial Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> - 2016-03-29 16:30 +0200
csiph-web