Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1366209
| From | okaya@codeaurora.org |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH V3 1/3] vfio, platform: add support for ACPI while detecting the reset driver |
| Date | 2016-03-29 14:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ri0MP-65P-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rhFyF-7M5-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <rhY8h-3VB-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rhZxp-4TD-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <ri00q-5tz-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 2016-03-29 07:25, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 29 March 2016 06:59:15 okaya@codeaurora.org wrote: >> On 2016-03-29 05:25, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> > On Monday 28 March 2016 09:35:22 Sinan Kaya wrote: >> >> The code is using the compatible DT string to associate a reset driver >> >> with >> >> the actual device itself. The compatible string does not exist on ACPI >> >> based systems. HID is the unique identifier for a device driver >> >> instead. >> >> The change allows a driver to register with DT compatible string or >> >> ACPI >> >> HID and then match the object with one of these conditions. >> >> >> >> Rules for loading the reset driver are as follow: >> >> - ACPI HID needs match for ACPI systems >> >> - DT compat needs to match for OF systems >> >> >> >> Tested-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> (device tree only) >> >> Tested-by: Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org> (ACPI only) >> >> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> >> >> >> > >> > >> > This really feels wrong for two reasons: >> > >> > * device assignment of non-PCI devices is really special and doesn't >> > seem to make sense on general purpose servers that would be the >> > target >> > for ACPI normally >> >> >> Why is it special? Acpi is not equal to pci. Platform devices are >> first >> class devices too. Especially, _cls was introduced for this reason. > > It still feels like a hack. The normal design for a server is to have > all internal devices show up on the PCI host bridge, next to the PCIe > ports, to have a simple way to manage any device, both internal and > off-chip. Putting a device on random MMIO registers outside of the > discoverable buses and have the firmware work around the lack of > discoverability will always be inferior. > It is a HW implementation choice. Having everything as pci problem has been already solved. I would vote for it when we had SW pci bridge layer just to use usb and sata. Not anymore. Especially, _cls solves this problem >> > >> > * If there is indeed a requirement for ACPI to handle something like >> > this, >> > it should be part of the ACPI spec, with a well-defined method of >> > handling >> > reset, rather than having to add a device specific hack for each >> > device separately. >> > >> >> I see. Normally, this is done by calling _rst method. AFAIK, Linux >> doesn’t support _rst. I can check its presence and call it if it is >> there. > > Yes, that sounds reasonable: In patch 2 where you check for the > presence of the reset method, just keep the existing logic for > DT based systems, and use _rst on ACPI based systems instead, > then you can drop both patches 1 and 3. > I can certainly drop patch #3 and push the reset responsibility to acpi. I never liked having a fragmented sw design across multiple drivers. I need something for patch #1. Compatible is a DT property not ACPI.but then, I won't have a reset driver anymore. If we think about how vfio pci works, we pass the pci vendor and device id to new_id file to find out which pci device needs to be pass thru. I can go to a similar route. This time we pass the object id through new_id and I call reset method on this object. Let me know what you think? > Arnd
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH V3 1/3] vfio, platform: add support for ACPI while detecting the reset driver Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> - 2016-03-28 15:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH V3 1/3] vfio, platform: add support for ACPI while detecting the reset driver Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-03-29 11:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH V3 1/3] vfio, platform: add support for ACPI while detecting the reset driver okaya@codeaurora.org - 2016-03-29 13:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH V3 1/3] vfio, platform: add support for ACPI while detecting the reset driver Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-03-29 13:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH V3 1/3] vfio, platform: add support for ACPI while detecting the reset driver okaya@codeaurora.org - 2016-03-29 14:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH V3 1/3] vfio, platform: add support for ACPI while detecting the reset driver Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-03-29 14:50 +0200
csiph-web