Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1362152

Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: core: Ensure we are at least in bounds for our constraints

From Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: core: Ensure we are at least in bounds for our constraints
Date 2016-03-21 22:10 +0100
Message-ID <rfffk-2ON-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rfdwS-1BU-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <rfdwS-1BU-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hi,

On 21.03.2016 21:18, Mark Brown wrote:
> Currently we only attempt to set the voltage during constraints
> application if an exact voltage is specified.  Extend this so that if
> the currently set voltage for the regualtor is outside the bounds set in

regulator

> constraints we will move the voltage to the nearest constraint, raising
> to the minimum or lowering to the maximum as needed.  This ensures that
> drivers can probe without the hardware being driven out of spec.
>
> Reported-by: Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> ---
>
> Untested so far, will give it a spin later/tomorrow.
>
>   drivers/regulator/core.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>   1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>

Patch 1 does not apply cleanly on 4.5-rc5, so I applied it by hand, 
however, you may add:

Tested-by: Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com>

Thanks,
Ivo

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 2/2] regulator: core: Ensure we are at least in bounds for our constraints Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-03-21 20:20 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: core: Ensure we are at least in bounds for  our constraints Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 22:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: core: Ensure we are at least in bounds for  our constraints Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> - 2016-03-24 07:20 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: core: Ensure we are at least in bounds for  our constraints Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> - 2016-03-24 08:20 +0100
        Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: core: Ensure we are at least in bounds for  our constraints Bjorn Andersson <bjorn@kryo.se> - 2016-03-27 01:00 +0100
          Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: core: Ensure we are at least in bounds  for our constraints Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-03-27 11:10 +0200
            Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: core: Ensure we are at least in bounds for  our constraints Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> - 2016-03-28 18:20 +0200
            Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: core: Ensure we are at least in bounds for  our constraints Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2016-03-29 14:10 +0200
              Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: core: Ensure we are at least in bounds  for our constraints Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-03-29 17:00 +0200
                Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: core: Ensure we are at least in bounds for  our constraints Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2016-03-29 20:10 +0200
                Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: core: Ensure we are at least in bounds  for our constraints Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-03-29 20:30 +0200
                RE: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: core: Ensure we are at least in bounds for  our constraints Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@nxp.com> - 2016-03-30 11:50 +0200
                Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: core: Ensure we are at least in bounds  for our constraints Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-03-30 17:30 +0200
  Applied "regulator: core: Ensure we are at least in bounds for our constraints" to the regulator tree Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-03-23 14:50 +0100

csiph-web