Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1362079

Re: livepatch: reuse module loader code to write relocations

From Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: livepatch: reuse module loader code to write relocations
Date 2016-03-21 20:30 +0100
Message-ID <rfdGy-1FG-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rdpCa-4V9-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rdpCa-4V9-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <rf8xc-6rV-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <rfdwS-1BU-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 03:18:32PM -0400, Jessica Yu wrote:
> +++ Miroslav Benes [21/03/16 14:55 +0100]:
> >On Wed, 16 Mar 2016, Jessica Yu wrote:
> >
> >[...]
> >
> >>+struct klp_buf {
> >>+	char symname[KSYM_SYMBOL_LEN];
> >
> >I think it is better to make this KSYM_NAME_LEN. KSYM_SYMBOL_LEN looks
> >like something different and KSYM_NAME_LEN is 128 which you reference
> >below.
> >
> 
> Ack, I did mean to use KSYM_NAME_LEN, thanks.
> 
> >>+	char objname[MODULE_NAME_LEN];
> >>+};
> >
> >[...]
> >
> >>+static int klp_resolve_symbols(Elf_Shdr *relasec, struct module *pmod)
> >>+{
> >>+	int i, cnt, vmlinux, ret;
> >>+	struct klp_buf bufs = {0};
> >>+	Elf_Rela *relas;
> >>+	Elf_Sym *sym;
> >>+	char *symname;
> >>+	unsigned long sympos;
> >>+
> >>+	relas = (Elf_Rela *) relasec->sh_addr;
> >>+	/* For each rela in this klp relocation section */
> >>+	for (i = 0; i < relasec->sh_size / sizeof(Elf_Rela); i++) {
> >>+		sym = pmod->core_kallsyms.symtab + ELF_R_SYM(relas[i].r_info);
> >>+		if (sym->st_shndx != SHN_LIVEPATCH)
> >>+			return -EINVAL;
> >>+
> >>+		klp_clear_buf(&bufs);
> >>+
> >>+		/* Format: .klp.sym.objname.symbol_name,sympos */
> >>+		symname = pmod->core_kallsyms.strtab + sym->st_name;
> >>+		cnt = sscanf(symname, ".klp.sym.%64[^.].%128[^,],%lu",
> >>+			     bufs.objname, bufs.symname, &sympos);
> >
> >It would be really nice to change actual values for their macro
> >definitions, but this would be a mess which is not worth it. Anyway
> >shouldn't those width modifiers be %63 and %127 to make a room for \0?
> >
> 
> Yes, this is a concern and I'm not sure what the best way to fix it
> is. If both MODULE_NAME_LEN and KSYM_NAME_LEN were straight up
> constants, then I think Josh's stringify approach would have worked
> perfectly. However since MODULE_NAME_LEN translates to an expression
> (64 - sizeof(unsigned long)), which the preprocessor cannot evaluate,
> we will need another approach. Building the format strings at run time
> might be messier than we'd like. Alternatively we could just go the
> simple route and simply be a bit more aggressive on the upper bound
> for the format width; though the size of long varies on different
> architectures, afaik the max size it could ever be on any arch is 8
> bytes, so perhaps 64 - 8 = 56 (then - 1 to make room for \0) might be
> an appropriate field width. This would deserve a comment as well.

I think something like that would be good, along with:

  BUILD_BUG_ON(MODULE_NAME_LEN < 56);

and a comment explaining why.

-- 
Josh

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH v5 4/6] livepatch: reuse module loader code to write  relocations Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> - 2016-03-21 15:00 +0100
  Re: livepatch: reuse module loader code to write relocations Jessica Yu <jeyu@redhat.com> - 2016-03-21 20:20 +0100
    Re: livepatch: reuse module loader code to write relocations Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-03-21 20:30 +0100
    Re: livepatch: reuse module loader code to write relocations Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> - 2016-03-21 22:20 +0100
      Re: livepatch: reuse module loader code to write relocations Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-03-21 22:40 +0100
        Re: livepatch: reuse module loader code to write relocations Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> - 2016-03-21 23:10 +0100
          Re: livepatch: reuse module loader code to write relocations Jessica Yu <jeyu@redhat.com> - 2016-03-22 20:10 +0100

csiph-web