Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1362050
| From | Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] cgroup aware workqueues |
| Date | 2016-03-21 19:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <rfchs-Dm-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <reaUp-1RE-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rf3nQ-2Wt-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> writes: > On 03/18/2016 11:14 PM, Bandan Das wrote: > [..] >> Netperf: >> Two guests running netperf in parallel. >> Without patches With patches >> >> TCP_STREAM (10^6 bits/second) 975.45 978.88 >> TCP_RR (Trans/second) 20121 18820.82 >> UDP_STREAM (10^6 bits/second) 1287.82 1184.5 >> UDP_RR (Trans/second) 20766.72 19667.08 >> Time a 4G iso download 2m 33 seconds 3m 02 seconds > > So TCP stream stays the same everything else shows a regression? Not good. > Have you an idea why this happens? I am not sure yet but my guess is the way these patches implement cgroup support. I will run some tests just with workqueues (and without these patches) and see if the newer numbers are consistent with these.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC PATCH 0/4] cgroup aware workqueues Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com> - 2016-03-18 23:20 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] cgroup aware workqueues Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2016-03-20 19:20 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] cgroup aware workqueues Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com> - 2016-03-21 18:40 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] cgroup aware workqueues "Michael Rapoport" <RAPOPORT@il.ibm.com> - 2016-03-21 09:00 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] cgroup aware workqueues Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> - 2016-03-21 09:30 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] cgroup aware workqueues Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com> - 2016-03-21 19:00 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] cgroup aware workqueues Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com> - 2016-03-21 18:50 +0100
vhost threading model (was: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] cgroup aware workqueues) "Michael Rapoport" <RAPOPORT@il.ibm.com> - 2016-03-22 08:20 +0100
Re: vhost threading model Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com> - 2016-03-22 20:10 +0100
Re: vhost threading model "Michael Rapoport" <RAPOPORT@il.ibm.com> - 2016-03-23 12:20 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] cgroup aware workqueues Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2016-03-30 19:10 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] cgroup aware workqueues "Michael Rapoport" <RAPOPORT@il.ibm.com> - 2016-03-31 08:20 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] cgroup aware workqueues Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2016-03-31 19:20 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] cgroup aware workqueues Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com> - 2016-03-31 20:50 +0200
csiph-web