Re: [PATCH 4/3] rtmutex: Avoid barrier in rt_mutex_handle_deadlock

From	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH 4/3] rtmutex: Avoid barrier in rt_mutex_handle_deadlock
Date	2016-03-22 22:50 +0100
Message-ID	<rfClA-23H-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(5 earlier) <rftBE-4jp-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <rfuxH-4WW-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rfv0L-5cK-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <rfvN7-5Sf-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rfxFg-7gW-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 05:41:22PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 03:45:37PM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> 
> > Sure, looks nice and makes a lot of sense. And the text looks a bit familiar
> > to me ;)
> > 
> > Could you provide From: and Signed-off-by: lines?
> 
> Of course, find below.
> 
> ---
> Subject: s390: Clarify pagefault interrupt
> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> 
> While looking at set_task_state() users I stumbled over the s390 pfault
> interrupt code.  Since Heiko provided a great explanation on how it
> worked, I figured we ought to preserve this.
> 
> Also make a few little tweaks to the code to aid in readability and
> explicitly comment the unusual blocking scheme.
> 
> Based-on-text-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> ---
>  arch/s390/mm/fault.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Applied, with some whitespace changes from me. Thank you!

Thread

Re: [PATCH 4/3] rtmutex: Avoid barrier in rt_mutex_handle_deadlock Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> - 2016-03-21 19:20 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 4/3] rtmutex: Avoid barrier in rt_mutex_handle_deadlock Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-03-22 11:30 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 4/3] rtmutex: Avoid barrier in rt_mutex_handle_deadlock Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> - 2016-03-22 12:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 4/3] rtmutex: Avoid barrier in rt_mutex_handle_deadlock Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-03-22 13:30 +0100
        Re: [PATCH 4/3] rtmutex: Avoid barrier in rt_mutex_handle_deadlock Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> - 2016-03-22 14:30 +0100
          Re: [PATCH 4/3] rtmutex: Avoid barrier in rt_mutex_handle_deadlock Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-03-22 15:00 +0100
            Re: [PATCH 4/3] rtmutex: Avoid barrier in rt_mutex_handle_deadlock Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> - 2016-03-22 15:50 +0100
              Re: [PATCH 4/3] rtmutex: Avoid barrier in rt_mutex_handle_deadlock Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-03-22 17:50 +0100
                Re: [PATCH 4/3] rtmutex: Avoid barrier in rt_mutex_handle_deadlock Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> - 2016-03-22 22:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 4/3] rtmutex: Avoid barrier in rt_mutex_handle_deadlock Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> - 2016-03-25 03:40 +0100

csiph-web