Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1363025
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/9] sched: add schedule_timeout_idle() |
| Date | 2016-03-22 22:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <rfC2d-1V8-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <rftLl-4o3-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <rfu4G-4uD-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <rfuem-4Pn-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <rfuxH-4WW-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rfyL0-88A-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 01:56:26PM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 02:22:49PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 02:08:23PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Tue 22-03-16 13:51:13, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > If that sounds like a more appropriate plan I won't object. I can simply
> > > change my patch to do __set_current_state and schedule_timeout.
> >
> > I dunno, I just think these wrappers are silly.
>
> Adding out-of-line, exported wrappers for every single task state is
> kind of silly. But it's still a common operation to wait in a certain
> state, so having a single function for that makes sense. Kind of like
> spin_lock_irqsave and friends.
>
> Maybe this would be better?:
>
> static inline long schedule_timeout_state(long timeout, long state)
> {
> __set_current_state(state);
> return schedule_timeout(timeout);
> }
Probably. However, with such semantics the schedule*() name is wrong
too, you cannot use these functions to build actual wait loops etc.
So maybe:
static inline long sleep_in_state(long timeout, long state)
{
__set_current_state(state);
return schedule_timeout(timeout);
}
might be an even better name; but at that point we look very like the
msleep*() class of function, so maybe we should do:
long sleep_in_state(long state, long timeout)
{
while (timeout && !signal_pending_state(state, current)) {
__set_current_state(state);
timeout = schedule_timeout(timeout);
}
return timeout;
}
Hmm ?
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 1/9] sched: add schedule_timeout_idle() Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-03-22 12:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/9] sched: add schedule_timeout_idle() Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-03-22 13:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/9] sched: add schedule_timeout_idle() Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-03-22 13:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/9] sched: add schedule_timeout_idle() Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-03-22 14:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/9] sched: add schedule_timeout_idle() Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-03-22 14:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/9] sched: add schedule_timeout_idle() Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-03-22 14:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/9] sched: add schedule_timeout_idle() Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> - 2016-03-22 19:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/9] sched: add schedule_timeout_idle() Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-03-22 22:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/9] sched: add schedule_timeout_idle() Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-03-23 11:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/9] sched: add schedule_timeout_idle() Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-03-23 00:10 +0100
csiph-web