Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1360816
| From | Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] tools lib api: respect CROSS_COMPILE for the linker |
| Date | 2016-03-18 18:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <re6e7-2TF-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rdJUe-1ST-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <re5rI-1Fl-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <re5Bp-1Rm-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <re5L5-23u-51@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 01:45:22PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:38:15AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf escreveu: > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 01:25:47PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > > Em Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 06:27:50PM +0100, Lucas Stach escreveu: > > > > This fixes cross compilation of libapi. > > > > > > Humm, I guess that tools/lib/subcmd/Makefile has the same problem? And > > > there are also other cases where LD is not being set with CROSS_COMPILE, > > > Jiri, is there something else at play here? > > > > > > /me needs to cross compile all this code... > > > > Yeah, I already fixed the libsubcmd issue with commit c1d45c3abd49 in > > tip/core/objtool. (Sorry, I probably should have CC'ed you and Jiri.) > > Not a problem, it will all get merged eventually, but I noticed this: > > -CC = $(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc > -AR = $(CROSS_COMPILE)ar > +CC ?= $(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc > +LD ?= $(CROSS_COMPILE)ld > +AR ?= $(CROSS_COMPILE)ar > > This is how you fixed it, which is different from what other places do > for cross compiling, for instance, this is how tools/lib/bpf/Makefile > does (and it isn't setting LD as well): > > # Allow setting CC and AR, or setting CROSS_COMPILE as a prefix. > $(call allow-override,CC,$(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc) > $(call allow-override,AR,$(CROSS_COMPILE)ar) > > Which is different from what the kernel does in its main Makefile: > > # Make variables (CC, etc...) > AS = $(CROSS_COMPILE)as > LD = $(CROSS_COMPILE)ld > CC = $(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc > > I wonder if we could settle in one of these styles or if there is really > a reason to be creative :-) > > Better, all this could go to tools/scripts/Makefile.include? Yeah, I agree that it would be good to come up with a common and consistent approach tools-wide if possible. The reason I used '?=' is because objtool needs to be built with the host compiler, and the tools kbuild doesn't have hostprogs and HOSTCC. So I and overrode the CC variable. From tools/objtool/Makefile: # always use the host compiler CC = gcc LD = ld AR = ar So the 'CC ?= $(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc' in tools/lib/subcmd/Makefile allows the objtool Makefile to override the cross-compilation and use the host compiler instead. I _think_ 'allow-override' would also work, because the objtool Makefile exports the CC/LD/AR variables to the environment before descending into the subcmd directory. And 'allow-override' seems to allow overriding those variables if they were set in the environment. So 'allow-override' would probably be a good option. -- Josh
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] tools lib api: respect CROSS_COMPILE for the linker Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> - 2016-03-17 18:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] tools lib api: respect CROSS_COMPILE for the linker Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> - 2016-03-18 17:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] tools lib api: respect CROSS_COMPILE for the linker Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-03-18 17:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] tools lib api: respect CROSS_COMPILE for the linker Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-03-18 17:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] tools lib api: respect CROSS_COMPILE for the linker Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> - 2016-03-18 18:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] tools lib api: respect CROSS_COMPILE for the linker Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> - 2016-03-18 17:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] tools lib api: respect CROSS_COMPILE for the linker Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-03-18 18:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] tools lib api: respect CROSS_COMPILE for the linker Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> - 2016-03-18 18:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] tools lib api: respect CROSS_COMPILE for the linker Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-03-18 18:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] tools lib api: respect CROSS_COMPILE for the linker Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> - 2016-03-21 09:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] tools lib api: respect CROSS_COMPILE for the linker Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> - 2016-03-21 21:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] tools lib api: respect CROSS_COMPILE for the linker Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> - 2016-03-22 08:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] tools lib api: respect CROSS_COMPILE for the linker Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-03-22 14:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] tools lib api: respect CROSS_COMPILE for the linker Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-03-22 15:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] tools lib api: respect CROSS_COMPILE for the linker David Sharp <dhsharp@google.com> - 2016-03-22 19:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] tools lib api: respect CROSS_COMPILE for the linker David Sharp <dhsharp@google.com> - 2016-03-22 19:40 +0100
csiph-web