Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1360525

Re: [PATCH 14/15] dt-bindings: arm-gic: Drop 'clock-names' from binding document

From Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 14/15] dt-bindings: arm-gic: Drop 'clock-names' from binding document
Date 2016-03-18 12:00 +0100
Message-ID <re0im-4tH-29@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rdGWl-8uZ-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <rdH63-6P-45@gated-at.bofh.it> <rdYJA-3AO-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <rdZFE-4dR-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <re0im-4tH-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 18/03/16 10:52, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Jon,
> 
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> wrote:
>> On 18/03/16 09:13, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> wrote:
>>>> Commit afbbd2338176 ("irqchip/gic: Document optional Clock and Power
>>>> Domain properties") documented optional clock and power-dmoain properties
>>>> for the ARM GIC. Currently, there are no users of these and for the
>>>> Tegra210 Audio GIC (based upon the GIC-400) there are two clocks, a
>>>> functional clock and interface clock, that need to be enabled.
>>>
>>> The reason that there are no users for this is twofold:
>>>   1. The GIC driver doesn't have Runtime PM support yet,
>>>   2. There was no clean way to prevent the GIC's clock from being disabled.
>>> Due to this, adding the clocks to the DTSes would mean that they will be
>>> disabled during boot up as unused clocks, leading to a system lock-up.
>>>
>>> I had hoped your series would fix part 1. I gave it a try on r8a7791/koelsch,
>>> but unfortunately it seems the platform driver only supports non-root
>>> controllers, while the r8a7791 GIC is the primary one...
>>
>> Can you try making the following change ...
> 
> Thanks! I gave it a try, but no difference.

I assume you added the appropriate compatible flag? Any more details you
can share about why it is not working? Is it not registered early enough?

Jon

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH 14/15] dt-bindings: arm-gic: Drop 'clock-names' from  binding document Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2016-03-18 10:20 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 14/15] dt-bindings: arm-gic: Drop 'clock-names' from  binding document Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> - 2016-03-18 11:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 14/15] dt-bindings: arm-gic: Drop 'clock-names' from  binding document Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2016-03-18 12:00 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 14/15] dt-bindings: arm-gic: Drop 'clock-names' from  binding document Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> - 2016-03-18 12:00 +0100
        Re: [PATCH 14/15] dt-bindings: arm-gic: Drop 'clock-names' from  binding document Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2016-03-18 13:10 +0100
          Re: [PATCH 14/15] dt-bindings: arm-gic: Drop 'clock-names' from  binding document Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> - 2016-03-18 13:50 +0100
            Re: [PATCH 14/15] dt-bindings: arm-gic: Drop 'clock-names' from  binding document Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2016-03-18 14:10 +0100
              Re: [PATCH 14/15] dt-bindings: arm-gic: Drop 'clock-names' from  binding document Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> - 2016-03-18 19:40 +0100
          Re: [PATCH 14/15] dt-bindings: arm-gic: Drop 'clock-names' from  binding document Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> - 2016-03-18 13:50 +0100

csiph-web