Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1359583
| From | Joel Fernandes <agnel.joel@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: RFC on fixing mutex spinning on owner |
| Date | 2016-03-17 06:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <rdyP8-30M-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rdt34-7Be-37@gated-at.bofh.it> <rdtcK-7ER-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <rdtcK-7ER-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <rdvHA-UH-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 7:17 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 16:38:56 -0700
> Joel Fernandes <agnel.joel@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I am not sure if the problem is with the i915 driver, because the
> > mutex spin on owner stuff is mutex related so the mutex design may
> > potentially need a tweak (I mentioned a proposal of adding mutex
> > spinning time outs).
> > Also since this is latency issue related (I mentioned preemptoff
> > tracer and preempt disabled), I sent it to linux-rt-users. Thanks for
> > the tip about sending it to i915 developers, incase no one here has a
> > say in the matter, I can drop them a note later as well.
>
> Actually, the preempt off section here is not really an issue:
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> while (owner_running(lock, owner)) {
> if (need_resched())
> break;
>
> cpu_relax_lowlatency();
> }
> rcu_read_unlock();
>
> Although preemption may be disabled, that "need_resched()" check will
> break out of the loop if a higher priority task were to want to run on
> this CPU.
>
> I probably should add a hook there to let the preemptoff tracer know
> that this is not an issue.
Thanks Steve! That makes sense. If you do end up adding this hook to
the tracer, I would appreciate it if you could Cc me on the patch so I
could back port it to my kernel as well.
Also, since we are on the topic of preemptoff tracer, I posted a patch
[1] few days ago fixing another issue, if it looks Ok to you could you
pick it up? I had CC'd you on it.
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1099561.html
Thanks,
Joel
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
RFC on fixing mutex spinning on owner Joel Fernandes <agnel.joel@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 00:30 +0100
Re: RFC on fixing mutex spinning on owner Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com> - 2016-03-17 00:40 +0100
Re: RFC on fixing mutex spinning on owner Joel Fernandes <agnel.joel@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 00:40 +0100
Re: RFC on fixing mutex spinning on owner Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-03-17 03:20 +0100
Re: RFC on fixing mutex spinning on owner Joel Fernandes <agnel.joel@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 06:40 +0100
Re: RFC on fixing mutex spinning on owner Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-03-17 13:10 +0100
Re: RFC on fixing mutex spinning on owner Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-03-17 08:40 +0100
Re: RFC on fixing mutex spinning on owner Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@hofr.at> - 2016-03-17 10:10 +0100
Re: RFC on fixing mutex spinning on owner Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-03-17 11:20 +0100
Re: RFC on fixing mutex spinning on owner Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-03-17 12:20 +0100
Re: RFC on fixing mutex spinning on owner Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-03-17 13:10 +0100
Re: RFC on fixing mutex spinning on owner Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-03-17 13:20 +0100
Re: RFC on fixing mutex spinning on owner Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-03-17 14:40 +0100
Re: RFC on fixing mutex spinning on owner Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@hofr.at> - 2016-03-17 17:50 +0100
csiph-web