Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1359370

[PATCH v4 1/3] selftests/x86: Add a iopl test

Show all headers | View raw

This exercises two cases that are known to be buggy on Xen PV right
now.

Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/Makefile |   2 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/iopl.c   | 135 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 136 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/x86/iopl.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/Makefile
index d0c473f65850..506e5dea179e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/Makefile
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ include ../lib.mk
 
 .PHONY: all all_32 all_64 warn_32bit_failure clean
 
-TARGETS_C_BOTHBITS := single_step_syscall sysret_ss_attrs syscall_nt ptrace_syscall
+TARGETS_C_BOTHBITS := single_step_syscall sysret_ss_attrs syscall_nt ptrace_syscall iopl
 TARGETS_C_32BIT_ONLY := entry_from_vm86 syscall_arg_fault sigreturn test_syscall_vdso unwind_vdso \
 			test_FCMOV test_FCOMI test_FISTTP \
 			ldt_gdt \
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/iopl.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/iopl.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..c496ca97bc18
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/iopl.c
@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
+/*
+ * iopl.c - Test case for a Linux on Xen 64-bit bug
+ * Copyright (c) 2015 Andrew Lutomirski
+ */
+
+#define _GNU_SOURCE
+#include <err.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <stdint.h>
+#include <signal.h>
+#include <setjmp.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <string.h>
+#include <errno.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
+#include <sys/types.h>
+#include <sys/wait.h>
+#include <stdbool.h>
+#include <sched.h>
+#include <sys/io.h>
+
+static int nerrs = 0;
+
+static void sethandler(int sig, void (*handler)(int, siginfo_t *, void *),
+		       int flags)
+{
+	struct sigaction sa;
+	memset(&sa, 0, sizeof(sa));
+	sa.sa_sigaction = handler;
+	sa.sa_flags = SA_SIGINFO | flags;
+	sigemptyset(&sa.sa_mask);
+	if (sigaction(sig, &sa, 0))
+		err(1, "sigaction");
+
+}
+
+static jmp_buf jmpbuf;
+
+static void sigsegv(int sig, siginfo_t *si, void *ctx_void)
+{
+	siglongjmp(jmpbuf, 1);
+}
+
+int main(void)
+{
+	cpu_set_t cpuset;
+	CPU_ZERO(&cpuset);
+	CPU_SET(0, &cpuset);
+	if (sched_setaffinity(0, sizeof(cpuset), &cpuset) != 0)
+		err(1, "sched_setaffinity to CPU 0");
+
+	/* Probe for iopl support.  Note that iopl(0) works even as nonroot. */
+	if (iopl(3) != 0) {
+		printf("[OK]\tiopl(3) failed (%d) -- try running as root\n",
+		       errno);
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	/* Restore our original state prior to starting the test. */
+	if (iopl(0) != 0)
+		err(1, "iopl(0)");
+
+	pid_t child = fork();
+	if (child == -1)
+		err(1, "fork");
+
+	if (child == 0) {
+		printf("\tchild: set IOPL to 3\n");
+		if (iopl(3) != 0)
+			err(1, "iopl");
+
+		printf("[RUN]\tchild: write to 0x80\n");
+		asm volatile ("outb %%al, $0x80" : : "a" (0));
+
+		return 0;
+	} else {
+		int status;
+		if (waitpid(child, &status, 0) != child ||
+		    !WIFEXITED(status)) {
+			printf("[FAIL]\tChild died\n");
+			nerrs++;
+		} else if (WEXITSTATUS(status) != 0) {
+			printf("[FAIL]\tChild failed\n");
+			nerrs++;
+		} else {
+			printf("[OK]\tChild succeeded\n");
+		}
+	}
+
+	printf("[RUN]\tparent: write to 0x80 (should fail)\n");
+
+	sethandler(SIGSEGV, sigsegv, 0);
+	if (sigsetjmp(jmpbuf, 1) != 0) {
+		printf("[OK]\twrite was denied\n");
+	} else {
+		asm volatile ("outb %%al, $0x80" : : "a" (0));
+		printf("[FAIL]\twrite was allowed\n");
+		nerrs++;
+	}
+
+	/* Test the capability checks. */
+	printf("\tiopl(3)\n");
+	if (iopl(3) != 0)
+		err(1, "iopl(3)");
+
+	printf("\tDrop privileges\n");
+	if (setresuid(1, 1, 1) != 0) {
+		printf("[WARN]\tDropping privileges failed\n");
+		goto done;
+	}
+
+	printf("[RUN]\tiopl(3) unprivileged but with IOPL==3\n");
+	if (iopl(3) != 0) {
+		printf("[FAIL]\tiopl(3) should work if iopl is already 3 even if unprivileged\n");
+		nerrs++;
+	}
+
+	printf("[RUN]\tiopl(0) unprivileged\n");
+	if (iopl(0) != 0) {
+		printf("[FAIL]\tiopl(0) should work if iopl is already 3 even if unprivileged\n");
+		nerrs++;
+	}
+
+	printf("[RUN]\tiopl(3) unprivileged\n");
+	if (iopl(3) == 0) {
+		printf("[FAIL]\tiopl(3) should fail if when unprivileged if iopl==0\n");
+		nerrs++;
+	} else {
+		printf("[OK]\tFailed as expected\n");
+	}
+
+done:
+	return nerrs ? 1 : 0;
+}
+
-- 
2.5.0

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH v4 0/3] Xen iopl fixes Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2016-03-16 22:20 +0100
  [PATCH v4 1/3] selftests/x86: Add a iopl test Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2016-03-16 22:20 +0100
    [tip:x86/urgent] selftests/x86: Add an iopl test tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2016-03-17 10:30 +0100

csiph-web