Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1358559
| From | Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH v4 1/2] printk: Make printk() completely async |
| Date | 2016-03-16 08:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <rddB0-588-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rcBvI-4Pn-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <rcBvJ-4Pn-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <rcU5l-Bl-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <rcXZg-3bg-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <rdcvf-4sX-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On (03/16/16 14:39), Byungchul Park wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:07:38PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> >
> > something like this (*minimally tested so far*).
> >
> > -- move wake_up() and friends under the logbuf section; so we can detect
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> section protected by logbuf_lock?
>
> > printk() recursion from wake_up()
>
> Excuse me, but I fear that it can cause an unnecessary deadlock.
where? shouldn't it be
vprintk_emit()
local_irq_save(flags);
this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
raw_spin_lock(&logbuf_lock);
static logbuf_cpu = this_cpu;
wake_up_process()
spin_lock()
spin_dump()
vprintk_emit() << recursion
local_irq_save(flags);
this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
if (unlikely(logbuf_cpu == this_cpu)) {
recursion_bug = true;
return; << break recursion
}
?
> Furthermore it cannot be handled if it is caused by logbuf_lock.
sure, I'm not even trying to address a logbuf spin_dump recursion problem here.
I'm only trying to minimize the impact of newly introduced spin locks.
I don't have a very clear vision (at the moment) of how to fix printk recursion
caused by logbuf lock of console_sem corruptions, etc. Should spin_dump
be aware of the locks that can be taken by printk()? Hm, I can't even count all
the locks that possibly can be taken by printk->console_drivers and most likely
don't even see all of the cases where printk can recurse. Disable lock debug
in vprintk_emit() the same way lockdep is desabled? Hm...
Ingo's POV is that printk must be reworked and become smarter in this aspect.
> I mean that it would be better to keep the wake_up and friend out of the
> critical section by logbuf_lock.
in this case wake_up_process() can recurse us forever.
-ss
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC][PATCH v4 0/2] printk: Make printk() completely async Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 15:20 +0100
[RFC][PATCH v4 1/2] printk: Make printk() completely async Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 15:20 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH v4 1/2] printk: Make printk() completely async Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> - 2016-03-15 11:10 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH v4 1/2] printk: Make printk() completely async Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 15:20 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH v4 1/2] printk: Make printk() completely async Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2016-03-16 06:50 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH v4 1/2] printk: Make printk() completely async Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 08:00 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH v4 1/2] printk: Make printk() completely async Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2016-03-16 08:40 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH v4 1/2] printk: Make printk() completely async Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 09:00 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH v4 1/2] printk: Make printk() completely async Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2016-03-16 11:40 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH v4 1/2] printk: Make printk() completely async Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 01:40 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH v4 1/2] printk: Make printk() completely async Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2016-03-16 08:10 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH v4 1/2] printk: Make printk() completely async Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 08:10 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH v4 1/2] printk: Make printk() completely async Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> - 2016-03-15 17:00 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH v4 1/2] printk: Make printk() completely async Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 03:10 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH v4 1/2] printk: Make printk() completely async Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2016-03-16 03:20 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH v4 1/2] printk: Make printk() completely async Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 03:40 +0100
[RFC][PATCH v4 2/2] printk: Skip messages on oops Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 15:20 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH v4 2/2] printk: Skip messages on oops Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 12:00 +0100
csiph-web