Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1356805
| From | Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] printk: Make printing of spin_dump() deferred to avoid a deadlock |
| Date | 2016-03-14 02:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <rcpEe-5dH-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rbsE9-4Ih-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <rbsE9-4Ih-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On (03/11/16 19:37), Byungchul Park wrote:
[..]
> +static void __spin_dump_deferred(raw_spinlock_t *lock, const char *msg)
> +{
> + printk_func_t s;
> +
> + s = this_cpu_read(printk_func);
> + this_cpu_write(printk_func, vprintk_deferred);
> +
> + /*
> + * To change printk_func, it must be in preempt disabled and irq
> + * disabled. WARN_ON() should be called after the change because
> + * the default printk_func which may be called from WARN_ON()
> + * is prohibited in this context.
> + */
> + WARN_ON(!preempt_count() || !irqs_disabled());
> + __spin_dump(lock, msg);
> +
> + this_cpu_write(printk_func, s);
> +
> + printk_pending_output();
> +}
>
> +static void spin_dump(raw_spinlock_t *lock, const char *msg)
> +{
> + if (unlikely(console_sem_spin_is_held()))
> + __spin_dump_deferred(lock, msg);
> + else
> + __spin_dump(lock, msg);
> +}
so can it be
vprintk_emit()
__spin_dump_deferred()
vprintk_deferred()
vprintk_emit()
__spin_dump_deferred()
vprintk_deferred()
or am I getting it wrong?
-ss
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v6 0/2] Make printing of spin_dump() deferred to avoid a deadlock Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2016-03-11 11:40 +0100
[PATCH v6 2/2] printk: Make printing of spin_dump() deferred to avoid a deadlock Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2016-03-11 11:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] printk: Make printing of spin_dump() deferred to avoid a deadlock Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 02:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] printk: Make printing of spin_dump() deferred to avoid a deadlock Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2016-03-14 03:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] printk: Make printing of spin_dump() deferred to avoid a deadlock Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 03:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] printk: Make printing of spin_dump() deferred to avoid a deadlock Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2016-03-14 05:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] printk: Make printing of spin_dump() deferred to avoid a deadlock Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2016-03-16 03:10 +0100
[PATCH v6 1/2] printk: Factor out buffering and irq work queuing in printk_deferred Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2016-03-11 11:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] printk: Factor out buffering and irq work queuing in printk_deferred Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 02:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] printk: Factor out buffering and irq work queuing in printk_deferred Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2016-03-14 05:50 +0100
csiph-web