Re: [PATCH] batman-adv: Less function calls in batadv_is_ap_isolated() after error detection

From	Antonio Quartulli <a@unstable.cc>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH] batman-adv: Less function calls in batadv_is_ap_isolated() after error detection
Date	2016-03-15 01:20 +0100
Message-ID	<rcKSm-2ES-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<qwRA7-67v-37@gated-at.bofh.it> <rbuFZ-6nv-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <rbuFZ-6nv-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <rcGlH-86m-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 03:25:02PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 13:40:56 +0100
> 
> > From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> > Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 13:10:20 +0100
> > 
> > The variables "tt_local_entry" and "tt_global_entry" were eventually
> > checked again despite of a corresponding null pointer test before.
> > 
> > * Avoid this double check by reordering a function call sequence
> >   and the better selection of jump targets.
> > 
> > * Omit the initialisation for these variables at the beginning then.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> 
> I am assuming Antonio will take this in via his tree.
> 

Yeah, it will go through our tree. Still under review right now.

Cheers,

-- 
Antonio Quartulli

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH] batman-adv: Less function calls in batadv_is_ap_isolated()  after error detection SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-03-11 13:50 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] batman-adv: Less function calls in  batadv_is_ap_isolated() after error detection David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2016-03-14 20:30 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] batman-adv: Less function calls in  batadv_is_ap_isolated() after error detection Antonio Quartulli <a@unstable.cc> - 2016-03-15 01:20 +0100

csiph-web