Re: [PATCH V14 5/9] dma: qcom_hidma: implement lower level hardware interface

From	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH V14 5/9] dma: qcom_hidma: implement lower level hardware interface
Date	2016-03-11 03:10 +0100
Message-ID	<rbkGC-7yM-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<qYGlz-3LM-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qYGlA-3LM-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 11:34:36PM -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote:

> +
> +#define EVRE_SIZE			16	/* each EVRE is 16 bytes */
> +
> +#define TRCA_CTRLSTS_OFFSET		0x000
> +#define TRCA_RING_LOW_OFFSET		0x008
> +#define TRCA_RING_HIGH_OFFSET		0x00C
> +#define TRCA_RING_LEN_OFFSET		0x010
> +#define TRCA_READ_PTR_OFFSET		0x018
> +#define TRCA_WRITE_PTR_OFFSET		0x020
> +#define TRCA_DOORBELL_OFFSET		0x400
> +
> +#define EVCA_CTRLSTS_OFFSET		0x000
> +#define EVCA_INTCTRL_OFFSET		0x004
> +#define EVCA_RING_LOW_OFFSET		0x008
> +#define EVCA_RING_HIGH_OFFSET		0x00C
> +#define EVCA_RING_LEN_OFFSET		0x010
> +#define EVCA_READ_PTR_OFFSET		0x018
> +#define EVCA_WRITE_PTR_OFFSET		0x020
> +#define EVCA_DOORBELL_OFFSET		0x400
> +
> +#define EVCA_IRQ_STAT_OFFSET		0x100
> +#define EVCA_IRQ_CLR_OFFSET		0x108
> +#define EVCA_IRQ_EN_OFFSET		0x110
> +
> +#define EVRE_CFG_IDX			0
> +#define EVRE_LEN_IDX			1
> +#define EVRE_DEST_LOW_IDX		2
> +#define EVRE_DEST_HI_IDX		3
> +
> +#define EVRE_ERRINFO_BIT_POS		24
> +#define EVRE_CODE_BIT_POS		28
> +
> +#define EVRE_ERRINFO_MASK		GENMASK(3, 0)
> +#define EVRE_CODE_MASK			GENMASK(3, 0)

These are rest here are not namespace properly...

> +static int hidma_ll_enable(struct hidma_lldev *lldev)
> +{
> +	u32 val;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	val = readl(lldev->evca + EVCA_CTRLSTS_OFFSET);
> +	val &= ~(CH_CONTROL_MASK << 16);
> +	val |= CH_ENABLE << 16;
> +	writel(val, lldev->evca + EVCA_CTRLSTS_OFFSET);
> +
> +	ret = readl_poll_timeout(lldev->evca + EVCA_CTRLSTS_OFFSET, val,
> +				 (HIDMA_CH_STATE(val) == CH_ENABLED) ||
> +				 (HIDMA_CH_STATE(val) == CH_RUNNING), 1000,
> +				 10000);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(lldev->dev, "event channel did not get enabled\n");
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	val = readl(lldev->trca + TRCA_CTRLSTS_OFFSET);
> +	val &= ~(CH_CONTROL_MASK << 16);
> +	val |= CH_ENABLE << 16;
> +	writel(val, lldev->trca + TRCA_CTRLSTS_OFFSET);
> +
> +	ret = readl_poll_timeout(lldev->trca + TRCA_CTRLSTS_OFFSET, val,
> +				 (HIDMA_CH_STATE(val) == CH_ENABLED) ||
> +				 (HIDMA_CH_STATE(val) == CH_RUNNING), 1000,
> +				 10000);

first arg for readl_poll_timeout is accessor fn to do read, which doesnt
seem to be here... so what did i miss?


> +void hidma_ll_queue_request(struct hidma_lldev *lldev, u32 tre_ch)
> +{
> +	struct hidma_tre *tre;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	tre = &lldev->trepool[tre_ch];
> +
> +	/* copy the TRE into its location in the TRE ring */
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&lldev->lock, flags);
> +	tre->tre_index = lldev->tre_write_offset / TRE_SIZE;
> +	lldev->pending_tre_list[tre->tre_index] = tre;
> +	memcpy(lldev->tre_ring + lldev->tre_write_offset, &tre->tre_local[0],
> +	       TRE_SIZE);
> +	lldev->tx_status_list[tre->idx].err_code = 0;
> +	lldev->tx_status_list[tre->idx].err_info = 0;
> +	tre->queued = 1;
> +	lldev->pending_tre_count++;
> +	lldev->tre_write_offset = (lldev->tre_write_offset + TRE_SIZE)
> +	    % lldev->tre_ring_size;

These and above one should be right justfied per coding style

-- 
~Vinod

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH V14 5/9] dma: qcom_hidma: implement lower level hardware  interface Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> - 2016-03-11 03:10 +0100
  Re: [PATCH V14 5/9] dma: qcom_hidma: implement lower level hardware  interface Okaya@codeaurora.org - 2016-03-11 04:10 +0100
  Re: [PATCH V14 5/9] dma: qcom_hidma: implement lower level hardware  interface Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> - 2016-03-11 17:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH V14 5/9] dma: qcom_hidma: implement lower level hardware  interface Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> - 2016-03-11 17:30 +0100
      Re: [PATCH V14 5/9] dma: qcom_hidma: implement lower level hardware  interface Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> - 2016-03-11 17:50 +0100
        Re: [PATCH V14 5/9] dma: qcom_hidma: implement lower level hardware  interface Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> - 2016-03-11 20:30 +0100
          Re: [PATCH V14 5/9] dma: qcom_hidma: implement lower level hardware  interface Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> - 2016-03-11 23:00 +0100
            Re: [PATCH V14 5/9] dma: qcom_hidma: implement lower level hardware  interface Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> - 2016-03-13 17:00 +0100
              Re: [PATCH V14 5/9] dma: qcom_hidma: implement lower level hardware  interface Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> - 2016-03-14 15:00 +0100
          Re: [PATCH V14 5/9] dma: qcom_hidma: implement lower level hardware  interface Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> - 2016-03-13 17:00 +0100
            Re: [PATCH V14 5/9] dma: qcom_hidma: implement lower level hardware  interface Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> - 2016-03-14 15:00 +0100

csiph-web