Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1355153

Re: avr32 build failures in linux-next

From Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: avr32 build failures in linux-next
Date 2016-03-10 15:30 +0100
Message-ID <rb9Lc-89a-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (6 earlier) <qZWy1-7BS-67@gated-at.bofh.it> <r07MK-72e-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <raS7E-44y-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rb8YN-7CH-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <rb9i9-7Ja-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> writes:

> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> wrote:
>> Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 6:02 AM, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
>>>> On 02/08/2016 08:06 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 7:28 PM, Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Not very surprising either.  The number of people using Linux on avr32
>>>>>> is probably approximately zero, and if anyone is, they're likely still
>>>>>> running 2.6.32 or thereabouts.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Once I tried up the topic about removal avr32 for good, but looks like
>>>>> it wasn't a good time. Maybe now is better? It would really reduce a
>>>>> burden on many drivers.
>>>>>
>>>> I would agree, as long as the maintainers agree. We don't want to repeat
>>>> the h8300 experience.
>>>
>>> So, are we going to agree that avr32 must be retired from next cycle?
>>>
>>> P.S. I have no idea how to fix this "…relocation truncated to fit:
>>> R_AVR32_21S…", though I can test anything anyone propose.
>>
>> The error goes away if CONFIG_AIO_THREAD is disabled.  Still don't know why.
>
> A straight guess: it has reduced enough room to fit the relocation window?

That was my first guess as well, but it was wrong.  See the patch I just
sent for an explanation.

-- 
Måns Rullgård

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: avr32 build failures in linux-next Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 20:40 +0100
  Re: avr32 build failures in linux-next Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> - 2016-03-09 21:00 +0100
    Re: avr32 build failures in linux-next Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 06:00 +0100
  Re: avr32 build failures in linux-next Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> - 2016-03-10 14:40 +0100
    Re: avr32 build failures in linux-next Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 15:00 +0100
      Re: avr32 build failures in linux-next Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> - 2016-03-10 15:30 +0100
  Re: avr32 build failures in linux-next One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> - 2016-03-10 15:40 +0100
    Re: avr32 build failures in linux-next Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> - 2016-03-10 15:40 +0100
      Re: avr32 build failures in linux-next Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 16:20 +0100

csiph-web