Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1355153
| From | Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: avr32 build failures in linux-next |
| Date | 2016-03-10 15:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <rb9Lc-89a-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <qZWy1-7BS-67@gated-at.bofh.it> <r07MK-72e-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <raS7E-44y-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rb8YN-7CH-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <rb9i9-7Ja-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> wrote: >> Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 6:02 AM, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote: >>>> On 02/08/2016 08:06 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 7:28 PM, Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Not very surprising either. The number of people using Linux on avr32 >>>>>> is probably approximately zero, and if anyone is, they're likely still >>>>>> running 2.6.32 or thereabouts. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Once I tried up the topic about removal avr32 for good, but looks like >>>>> it wasn't a good time. Maybe now is better? It would really reduce a >>>>> burden on many drivers. >>>>> >>>> I would agree, as long as the maintainers agree. We don't want to repeat >>>> the h8300 experience. >>> >>> So, are we going to agree that avr32 must be retired from next cycle? >>> >>> P.S. I have no idea how to fix this "…relocation truncated to fit: >>> R_AVR32_21S…", though I can test anything anyone propose. >> >> The error goes away if CONFIG_AIO_THREAD is disabled. Still don't know why. > > A straight guess: it has reduced enough room to fit the relocation window? That was my first guess as well, but it was wrong. See the patch I just sent for an explanation. -- Måns Rullgård
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: avr32 build failures in linux-next Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 20:40 +0100
Re: avr32 build failures in linux-next Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> - 2016-03-09 21:00 +0100
Re: avr32 build failures in linux-next Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 06:00 +0100
Re: avr32 build failures in linux-next Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> - 2016-03-10 14:40 +0100
Re: avr32 build failures in linux-next Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 15:00 +0100
Re: avr32 build failures in linux-next Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> - 2016-03-10 15:30 +0100
Re: avr32 build failures in linux-next One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> - 2016-03-10 15:40 +0100
Re: avr32 build failures in linux-next Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> - 2016-03-10 15:40 +0100
Re: avr32 build failures in linux-next Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 16:20 +0100
csiph-web