Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1354932

Re: [PATCH 1/5] doc/memory-barriers: fix missed renaming: s/lock/acquire

From SeongJae Park <sj38.park@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 1/5] doc/memory-barriers: fix missed renaming: s/lock/acquire
Date 2016-03-10 10:00 +0100
Message-ID <rb4BP-4lZ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <raWXE-7BC-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <raWXE-7BC-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rb3Z8-47H-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw



On Thu, 10 Mar 2016, David Howells wrote:

> SeongJae Park <sj38.park@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> -     - Locking functions.
>> +     - Acquiring functions.
>
> Actually, this should be 'locking' functions.  If you look at the text:
>
> 	ACQUIRING FUNCTIONS
> 	-------------------
>
> 	The Linux kernel has a number of locking constructs:
>
> 	 (*) spin locks
> 	 (*) R/W spin locks
> 	 (*) mutexes
> 	 (*) semaphores
> 	 (*) R/W semaphores
>
> It's specifically talking about locking functions that the kernel provides -
> or are we calling the spin acquires and R/W spin acquires now?  "Locking" is
> the key that people referring to the document are going to use.

AFAIU, the next line of the quoted text says the section is talking about
variants on "ACQUIRE" operations and "RELEASE" operations for each locking
constructs.  I thought the original change which changed the name of
section has made full consensus and I am just want to make the section
names in `Contents` section and its real section name.  I will listen to
other's opinions more.


Thanks,
SeongJae Park

>
> David
>

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 1/5] doc/memory-barriers: fix missed renaming: s/lock/acquire SeongJae Park <sj38.park@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 01:50 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 1/5] doc/memory-barriers: fix missed renaming: s/lock/acquire David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-03-10 09:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 1/5] doc/memory-barriers: fix missed renaming:  s/lock/acquire SeongJae Park <sj38.park@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 10:00 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 1/5] doc/memory-barriers: fix missed renaming: s/lock/acquire David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-03-10 10:50 +0100
        Re: [PATCH 1/5] doc/memory-barriers: fix missed renaming: s/lock/acquire SeongJae Park <sj38.park@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 15:50 +0100

csiph-web