Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1352849

Re: [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more (was: Re: [PATCH 0/3] OOM detection rework v4)

From Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more (was: Re: [PATCH 0/3] OOM detection rework v4)
Date 2016-03-08 11:40 +0100
Message-ID <randw-84x-31@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <qY5Fq-2vi-55@gated-at.bofh.it> <r5V6a-6mZ-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <r60pc-1Hh-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <r7DeO-8hr-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <ra5Tk-543-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Mon, 7 Mar 2016, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 29-02-16 22:02:13, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > Andrew,
> > could you queue this one as well, please? This is more a band aid than a
> > real solution which I will be working on as soon as I am able to
> > reproduce the issue but the patch should help to some degree at least.
> 
> Joonsoo wasn't very happy about this approach so let me try a different
> way. What do you think about the following? Hugh, Sergey does it help
> for your load? I have tested it with the Hugh's load and there was no
> major difference from the previous testing so at least nothing has blown
> up as I am not able to reproduce the issue here.

Did not help with my load at all, I'm afraid: quite the reverse,
OOMed very much sooner (as usual on order=2), and with much more
noise (multiple OOMs) than your previous patch.

vmstats.xz attached; sorry, I don't have tracing built in,
and must move on to the powerpc issue before going back to bed.

I do hate replying without having something constructive to say, but
have very little time to think about this, and no bright ideas so far.

I do not understand why it's so easy for me to reproduce, yet impossible
for you - unless it's that you are still doing all your testing in a VM?
Is Sergey the only other to see this issue?

Hugh

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more (was: Re:  [PATCH 0/3] OOM detection rework v4) Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-03-07 17:10 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more (was: Re:  [PATCH 0/3] OOM detection rework v4) Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 04:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more (was: Re:  [PATCH 0/3] OOM detection rework v4) Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-03-08 10:10 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more (was: Re:  [PATCH 0/3] OOM detection rework v4) Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 10:30 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2016-03-08 10:30 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 10:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-03-08 10:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2016-03-08 11:00 +0100
        Re: [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-03-08 11:20 +0100
          Re: [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2016-03-08 12:20 +0100
            Re: [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-03-08 13:30 +0100
              Re: [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2016-03-08 13:40 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more (was: Re:  [PATCH 0/3] OOM detection rework v4) Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 11:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more (was: Re:  [PATCH 0/3] OOM detection rework v4) Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-03-08 15:00 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more (was:  Re: [PATCH 0/3] OOM detection rework v4) Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> - 2016-03-08 11:40 +0100
  [PATCH 1/3] mm, compaction: change COMPACT_ constants into enum Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-03-08 14:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm, compaction: change COMPACT_ constants into enum Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2016-03-08 15:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm, compaction: change COMPACT_ constants into enum "Hillf Danton" <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> - 2016-03-09 05:00 +0100
  [PATCH 3/3] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-03-08 14:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2016-03-08 15:40 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-03-08 15:50 +0100
        Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2016-03-08 16:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-03-09 12:20 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2016-03-09 15:10 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> - 2016-03-11 13:20 +0100
        Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-03-11 14:10 +0100
          Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> - 2016-03-11 20:10 +0100
            Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-03-14 17:30 +0100
  [PATCH 0/2] oom rework: high order enahncements Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-03-08 14:50 +0100
    [PATCH 2/3] mm, compaction: cover all compaction mode in compact_zone Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-03-08 14:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm, compaction: cover all compaction mode in  compact_zone Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2016-03-08 15:30 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm, compaction: cover all compaction mode in compact_zone "Hillf Danton" <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> - 2016-03-09 05:00 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more (was: Re:  [PATCH 0/3] OOM detection rework v4) Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 16:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more (was: Re:  [PATCH 0/3] OOM detection rework v4) Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-03-08 17:10 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more (was: Re:  [PATCH 0/3] OOM detection rework v4) Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 18:10 +0100
        Re: [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more (was: Re:  [PATCH 0/3] OOM detection rework v4) Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-03-09 11:50 +0100
          Re: [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more (was: Re:  [PATCH 0/3] OOM detection rework v4) Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 16:00 +0100
            Re: [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more (was: Re:  [PATCH 0/3] OOM detection rework v4) Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-03-11 16:30 +0100

csiph-web