Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1352849
| From | Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more (was: Re: [PATCH 0/3] OOM detection rework v4) |
| Date | 2016-03-08 11:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <randw-84x-31@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <qY5Fq-2vi-55@gated-at.bofh.it> <r5V6a-6mZ-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <r60pc-1Hh-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <r7DeO-8hr-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <ra5Tk-543-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Mon, 7 Mar 2016, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Mon 29-02-16 22:02:13, Michal Hocko wrote: > > Andrew, > > could you queue this one as well, please? This is more a band aid than a > > real solution which I will be working on as soon as I am able to > > reproduce the issue but the patch should help to some degree at least. > > Joonsoo wasn't very happy about this approach so let me try a different > way. What do you think about the following? Hugh, Sergey does it help > for your load? I have tested it with the Hugh's load and there was no > major difference from the previous testing so at least nothing has blown > up as I am not able to reproduce the issue here. Did not help with my load at all, I'm afraid: quite the reverse, OOMed very much sooner (as usual on order=2), and with much more noise (multiple OOMs) than your previous patch. vmstats.xz attached; sorry, I don't have tracing built in, and must move on to the powerpc issue before going back to bed. I do hate replying without having something constructive to say, but have very little time to think about this, and no bright ideas so far. I do not understand why it's so easy for me to reproduce, yet impossible for you - unless it's that you are still doing all your testing in a VM? Is Sergey the only other to see this issue? Hugh
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more (was: Re: [PATCH 0/3] OOM detection rework v4) Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-03-07 17:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more (was: Re: [PATCH 0/3] OOM detection rework v4) Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 04:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more (was: Re: [PATCH 0/3] OOM detection rework v4) Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-03-08 10:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more (was: Re: [PATCH 0/3] OOM detection rework v4) Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 10:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2016-03-08 10:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 10:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-03-08 10:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2016-03-08 11:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-03-08 11:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2016-03-08 12:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-03-08 13:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2016-03-08 13:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more (was: Re: [PATCH 0/3] OOM detection rework v4) Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 11:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more (was: Re: [PATCH 0/3] OOM detection rework v4) Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-03-08 15:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more (was: Re: [PATCH 0/3] OOM detection rework v4) Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> - 2016-03-08 11:40 +0100
[PATCH 1/3] mm, compaction: change COMPACT_ constants into enum Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-03-08 14:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm, compaction: change COMPACT_ constants into enum Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2016-03-08 15:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm, compaction: change COMPACT_ constants into enum "Hillf Danton" <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> - 2016-03-09 05:00 +0100
[PATCH 3/3] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-03-08 14:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2016-03-08 15:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-03-08 15:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2016-03-08 16:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-03-09 12:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2016-03-09 15:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> - 2016-03-11 13:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-03-11 14:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> - 2016-03-11 20:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-03-14 17:30 +0100
[PATCH 0/2] oom rework: high order enahncements Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-03-08 14:50 +0100
[PATCH 2/3] mm, compaction: cover all compaction mode in compact_zone Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-03-08 14:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm, compaction: cover all compaction mode in compact_zone Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2016-03-08 15:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm, compaction: cover all compaction mode in compact_zone "Hillf Danton" <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> - 2016-03-09 05:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more (was: Re: [PATCH 0/3] OOM detection rework v4) Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 16:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more (was: Re: [PATCH 0/3] OOM detection rework v4) Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-03-08 17:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more (was: Re: [PATCH 0/3] OOM detection rework v4) Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 18:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more (was: Re: [PATCH 0/3] OOM detection rework v4) Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-03-09 11:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more (was: Re: [PATCH 0/3] OOM detection rework v4) Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 16:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more (was: Re: [PATCH 0/3] OOM detection rework v4) Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-03-11 16:30 +0100
csiph-web