Re: [PATCH] bus: simple-pm-bus: Use ARCH_RENESAS

From	Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH] bus: simple-pm-bus: Use ARCH_RENESAS
Date	2016-03-08 01:40 +0100
Message-ID	<radQU-1N3-71@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<r8qyT-8dz-39@gated-at.bofh.it> <r8wXF-4lu-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <r8Qtk-1NX-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <ra3ou-3ni-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 02:22:57PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 6:20 AM, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 09:31:49AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 2:39 AM, Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au> wrote:
> >> > Make use of ARCH_RENESAS in place of ARCH_SHMOBILE.
> >> >
> >> > This is part of an ongoing process to migrate from ARCH_SHMOBILE to
> >> > ARCH_RENESAS the motivation for which being that RENESAS seems to be a more
> >> > appropriate name than SHMOBILE for the majority of Renesas ARM based SoCs.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> >
> > I'm a little unsure of who should take this but for now I will
> > queue it up in next with a view to sending a pull request to Linus
> > for v4.6. I'm open to other ideas.
> 
> All but two entries in drivers/bus/Kconfig are for ARM platforms (the
> other two are for MIPS platforms), so I think arm-soc is appropriate.
> 
> Alternatively, GregKH?

Point taken. I'll queue it up for v4.7 for arm-soc.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH] bus: simple-pm-bus: Use ARCH_RENESAS Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2016-03-07 14:30 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] bus: simple-pm-bus: Use ARCH_RENESAS Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> - 2016-03-08 01:40 +0100

csiph-web