Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update

From	Doug Anderson <dianders@google.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update
Date	2016-03-07 17:40 +0100
Message-ID	<ra6mm-5hg-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(8 earlier) <r5mi8-6Kg-57@gated-at.bofh.it> <r5p6h-ci-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <r5pJ0-G1-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <r5qc3-SW-35@gated-at.bofh.it> <r6dmq-2FR-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

Thierry,

On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Doug Anderson <dianders@google.com> wrote:
> So just to summarize:
>
> * Add pwm_get_state(), pwm_apply_state(), pwm_get_args().
> pwm_get_state() initially returns 0 for duty cycle if driver doesn't
> support readout.
>
> * Re-implement pwm_get_period() (and maybe other similar functions)
> atop pwm_get_state() as you describe earlier in the thread.
>
> * Document pwm_get_period() (and maybe other similar functions) as deprecated.
>
> * Fix drivers for all current 2 users of PWM regulator to support
> hardware readout.
>
> * Update PWM regulator as you described earlier in the thread (Feb 23).
>
> * If PWM regulator is ever used on a new board whose PWM doesn't
> support hardware readout, the voltage will change at probe time.
>
>
> Did I get all that right?  Thanks!

Can you provide a "yes, you got that right" or a "no, you didn't
understand"?  That will unblock Boris, I think.

-Doug

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update Doug Anderson <dianders@google.com> - 2016-03-07 17:40 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 19:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> - 2016-03-11 11:00 +0100

csiph-web