Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1451401

[PATCH RFC V8 21/22] block, bfq: boost the throughput with random I/O on NCQ-capable HDDs

From Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject [PATCH RFC V8 21/22] block, bfq: boost the throughput with random I/O on NCQ-capable HDDs
Date 2016-07-27 18:20 +0200
Message-ID <rZzIT-1FV-67@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rvUxQ-3oW-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rZzIR-1FV-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


This patch is basically the counterpart, for NCQ-capable rotational
devices, of the previous patch. Exactly as the previous patch does on
flash-based devices and for any workload, this patch disables device
idling on rotational devices, but only for random I/O. In fact, only
with these queues disabling idling boosts the throughput on
NCQ-capable rotational devices. To not break service guarantees,
idling is disabled for NCQ-enabled rotational devices only when the
same symmetry conditions considered in the previous patches hold.

Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Arianna Avanzini <avanzini.arianna@gmail.com>
---
 block/cfq-iosched.c | 22 ++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/cfq-iosched.c b/block/cfq-iosched.c
index 7fee23b..ae17421 100644
--- a/block/cfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/cfq-iosched.c
@@ -38,7 +38,9 @@
  * Even better for latency, BFQ explicitly privileges the I/O of two
  * classes of time-sensitive applications: interactive and soft
  * real-time. This feature enables BFQ to provide applications in
- * these classes with a very low latency.
+ * these classes with a very low latency. Finally, BFQ also features
+ * additional heuristics for preserving both a low latency and a high
+ * throughput on NCQ-capable, rotational or flash-based devices.
  *
  * With respect to the version of BFQ presented in [1], and in the
  * papers cited therein, this implementation adds a hierarchical
@@ -5629,20 +5631,15 @@ static bool bfq_bfqq_may_idle(struct bfq_queue *bfqq)
 	 * The next variable takes into account the cases where idling
 	 * boosts the throughput.
 	 *
-	 * The value of the variable is computed considering that
-	 * idling is usually beneficial for the throughput if:
+	 * The value of the variable is computed considering, first, that
+	 * idling is virtually always beneficial for the throughput if:
 	 * (a) the device is not NCQ-capable, or
 	 * (b) regardless of the presence of NCQ, the device is rotational
-	 *     and the request pattern for bfqq is I/O-bound (possible
-	 *     throughput losses caused by granting idling to seeky queues
-	 *     are mitigated by the fact that, in all scenarios where
-	 *     boosting throughput is the best thing to do, i.e., in all
-	 *     symmetric scenarios, only a minimal idle time is allowed to
-	 *     seeky queues).
+	 *     and the request pattern for bfqq is I/O-bound and sequential.
 	 *
 	 * Secondly, and in contrast to the above item (b), idling an
 	 * NCQ-capable flash-based device would not boost the
-	 * throughput even with intense I/O; rather it would lower
+	 * throughput even with sequential I/O; rather it would lower
 	 * the throughput in proportion to how fast the device
 	 * is. Accordingly, the next variable is true if any of the
 	 * above conditions (a) and (b) is true, and, in particular,
@@ -5650,7 +5647,8 @@ static bool bfq_bfqq_may_idle(struct bfq_queue *bfqq)
 	 * device.
 	 */
 	idling_boosts_thr = !bfqd->hw_tag ||
-		(!blk_queue_nonrot(bfqd->queue) && bfq_bfqq_IO_bound(bfqq));
+		(!blk_queue_nonrot(bfqd->queue) && bfq_bfqq_IO_bound(bfqq) &&
+		 bfq_bfqq_idle_window(bfqq));
 
 	/*
 	 * The value of the next variable,
@@ -7457,7 +7455,7 @@ static int __init bfq_init(void)
 	if (ret)
 		goto err_pol_unreg;
 
-	pr_info("BFQ I/O-scheduler: v6");
+	pr_info("BFQ I/O-scheduler: v7r3");
 
 	return 0;
 
-- 
1.9.1

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH RFC V8 00/22] Replace the CFQ I/O Scheduler with BFQ Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org> - 2016-07-27 18:20 +0200
  [PATCH RFC V8 12/22] block, bfq: modify the peak-rate estimator Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org> - 2016-07-27 18:20 +0200
  [PATCH RFC V8 04/22] block, cfq: remove SSD-related logic Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org> - 2016-07-27 18:20 +0200
  [PATCH RFC V8 17/22] block, bfq: reduce latency during request-pool saturation Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org> - 2016-07-27 18:20 +0200
  [PATCH RFC V8 13/22] block, bfq: add more fairness with writes and slow processes Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org> - 2016-07-27 18:20 +0200
  [PATCH RFC V8 08/22] block, cfq: get rid of latency tunables Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org> - 2016-07-27 18:20 +0200
  [PATCH RFC V8 20/22] block, bfq: boost the throughput on NCQ-capable flash-based devices Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org> - 2016-07-27 18:20 +0200
  [PATCH RFC V8 19/22] block, bfq: reduce idling only in symmetric scenarios Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org> - 2016-07-27 18:20 +0200
  [PATCH RFC V8 22/22] block, bfq: handle bursts of queue activations Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org> - 2016-07-27 18:20 +0200
  [PATCH RFC V8 16/22] block, bfq: preserve a low latency also with NCQ-capable drives Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org> - 2016-07-27 18:20 +0200
  [PATCH RFC V8 11/22] block, bfq: improve throughput boosting Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org> - 2016-07-27 18:20 +0200
  [PATCH RFC V8 15/22] block, bfq: reduce I/O latency for soft real-time applications Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org> - 2016-07-27 18:20 +0200
  [PATCH RFC V8 02/22] block, cfq: remove close-based preemption Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org> - 2016-07-27 18:20 +0200
  [PATCH RFC V8 21/22] block, bfq: boost the throughput with random I/O on NCQ-capable HDDs Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org> - 2016-07-27 18:20 +0200
  [PATCH RFC V8 18/22] block, bfq: add Early Queue Merge (EQM) Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org> - 2016-07-27 18:20 +0200
  [PATCH RFC V8 07/22] block, cfq: get rid of workload type Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org> - 2016-07-27 18:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH RFC V8 00/22] Replace the CFQ I/O Scheduler with BFQ Paolo <paolo.valente@linaro.org> - 2016-07-28 19:00 +0200

csiph-web