Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1450674

Re: [RFC PATCH] mm/hugetlb: Avoid soft lockup in set_max_huge_pages()

From hejianet <hejianet@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [RFC PATCH] mm/hugetlb: Avoid soft lockup in set_max_huge_pages()
Date 2016-07-26 18:40 +0200
Message-ID <rZdyG-4lo-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rZcMi-3It-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <rZcVX-3LJ-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw



On 7/26/16 11:58 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 07/26/2016 08:44 AM, Jia He wrote:
>> This patch is to fix such soft lockup. I thouhgt it is safe to call
>> cond_resched() because alloc_fresh_gigantic_page and alloc_fresh_huge_page
>> are out of spin_lock/unlock section.
> Yikes.  So the call site for both the things you patch is this:
>
>>          while (count > persistent_huge_pages(h)) {
> ...
>>                  spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
>>                  if (hstate_is_gigantic(h))
>>                          ret = alloc_fresh_gigantic_page(h, nodes_allowed);
>>                  else
>>                          ret = alloc_fresh_huge_page(h, nodes_allowed);
>>                  spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
> and you choose to patch both of the alloc_*() functions.  Why not just
> fix it at the common call site?  Seems like that
> spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock) could be a cond_resched_lock() which would fix
> both cases.
>
> Also, putting that cond_resched() inside the for_each_node*() loop is an
> odd choice.  It seems to indicate that the loops can take a long time,
> which really isn't the case.  The _loop_ isn't long, right?
Yes,thanks for the suggestions
Will send out V2 later

B.R.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[RFC PATCH] mm/hugetlb: Avoid soft lockup in set_max_huge_pages() Jia He <hejianet@gmail.com> - 2016-07-26 17:50 +0200
  Re: [RFC PATCH] mm/hugetlb: Avoid soft lockup in set_max_huge_pages() Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> - 2016-07-26 18:00 +0200
    Re: [RFC PATCH] mm/hugetlb: Avoid soft lockup in set_max_huge_pages() hejianet <hejianet@gmail.com> - 2016-07-26 18:40 +0200
    Re: [RFC PATCH] mm/hugetlb: Avoid soft lockup in set_max_huge_pages() hejianet <hejianet@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 03:50 +0200
      Re: [RFC PATCH] mm/hugetlb: Avoid soft lockup in set_max_huge_pages() Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> - 2016-07-27 17:30 +0200

csiph-web