Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1452055
| From | "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/5 RFC] Add an interface to discover relationships between namespaces |
| Date | 2016-07-28 21:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rZYQV-20O-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (8 earlier) <rZfqN-5ya-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rZg3v-616-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <rZR33-53d-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rZR33-53d-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rZTod-6L3-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Eric, On 07/28/2016 02:56 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> writes: > >> On 07/26/2016 10:39 PM, Andrew Vagin wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 09:17:31PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > >>> If we want to compare two file descriptors of the current process, >>> it is one of cases for which kcmp can be used. We can call kcmp to >>> compare two namespaces which are opened in other processes. >> >> Is there really a use case there? I assume we're talking about the >> scenario where a process in one namespace opens a /proc/PID/ns/* >> file descriptor and passes that FD to another process via a UNIX >> domain socket. Is that correct? >> >> So, supposing that we want to build a map of the relationships >> between namespaces using the proposed kcmp() API, and there are >> say N namespaces? Does this mena we make (N * (N-1) / 2) calls >> to kcmp()? > > Potentially. The numbers are small enough O(N^2) isn't fatal. Define "small", please. O(N^2) makes me nervous about what other use cases lurk out there that may get bitten by this. > Where kcmp shines is that it allows migration to happen. Inode numbers > to change (which they very much will today), and still have things work. > We can keep it O(Nlog(N)) by taking advantage of not just the equality > but the ordering relationship. Although Ugh. Yes, that sounds pretty ugly... >One disadvantage of > kcmp currently is that the way the ordering relationship is defined > the order is not preserved over migration :( So, does kcmp() fully solve the proble(s) at hand? It sounds like not, if I understand your last point correctly. -- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 0/5 RFC] Add an interface to discover relationships between namespaces "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> - 2016-07-26 10:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/5 RFC] Add an interface to discover relationships between namespaces "W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us> - 2016-07-26 20:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/5 RFC] Add an interface to discover relationships between namespaces "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> - 2016-07-26 21:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/5 RFC] Add an interface to discover relationships between namespaces "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 12:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/5 RFC] Add an interface to discover relationships between namespaces ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) - 2016-07-28 15:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/5 RFC] Add an interface to discover relationships between namespaces "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 21:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/5 RFC] Add an interface to discover relationships between namespaces ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) - 2016-07-29 20:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/5 RFC] Add an interface to discover relationships between namespaces "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> - 2016-07-31 23:40 +0200
csiph-web