Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1452055

Re: [PATCH 0/5 RFC] Add an interface to discover relationships between namespaces

From "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 0/5 RFC] Add an interface to discover relationships between namespaces
Date 2016-07-28 21:10 +0200
Message-ID <rZYQV-20O-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (8 earlier) <rZfqN-5ya-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rZg3v-616-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <rZR33-53d-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rZR33-53d-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rZTod-6L3-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hi Eric,

On 07/28/2016 02:56 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On 07/26/2016 10:39 PM, Andrew Vagin wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 09:17:31PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
>
>>> If we want to compare two file descriptors of the current process,
>>> it is one of cases for which kcmp can be used. We can call kcmp to
>>> compare two namespaces which are opened in other processes.
>>
>> Is there really a use case there? I assume we're talking about the
>> scenario where a process in one namespace opens a /proc/PID/ns/*
>> file descriptor and passes that FD to another process via a UNIX
>> domain socket. Is that correct?
>>
>> So, supposing that we want to build a map of the relationships
>> between namespaces using the proposed kcmp() API, and there are
>> say N namespaces? Does this mena we make (N * (N-1) / 2) calls
>> to kcmp()?
>
> Potentially.  The numbers are small enough O(N^2) isn't fatal.

Define "small", please.

O(N^2) makes me nervous about what other use cases lurk out
there that may get bitten by this.

> Where kcmp shines is that it allows migration to happen.  Inode numbers
> to change (which they very much will today), and still have things work.


> We can keep it O(Nlog(N)) by taking advantage of not just the equality
> but the ordering relationship.  Although Ugh.

Yes, that sounds pretty ugly...

>One disadvantage of
> kcmp currently is that the way the ordering relationship is defined
> the order is not preserved over migration :(

So, does kcmp() fully solve the proble(s) at hand? It sounds like
not, if I understand your last point correctly.


-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH 0/5 RFC] Add an interface to discover relationships  between namespaces "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> - 2016-07-26 10:10 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 0/5 RFC] Add an interface to discover relationships  between namespaces "W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us> - 2016-07-26 20:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 0/5 RFC] Add an interface to discover relationships  between namespaces "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> - 2016-07-26 21:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 0/5 RFC] Add an interface to discover relationships  between namespaces "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 12:50 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 0/5 RFC] Add an interface to discover relationships between namespaces ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) - 2016-07-28 15:20 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 0/5 RFC] Add an interface to discover relationships  between namespaces "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 21:10 +0200
          Re: [PATCH 0/5 RFC] Add an interface to discover relationships between namespaces ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) - 2016-07-29 20:20 +0200
            Re: [PATCH 0/5 RFC] Add an interface to discover relationships  between namespaces "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> - 2016-07-31 23:40 +0200

csiph-web