Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1450443
| From | Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC] mm: bail out in shrin_inactive_list |
| Date | 2016-07-26 09:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rZ5hL-7Cz-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rYIXT-1RO-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rYKmZ-2Pk-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <rYZm2-3V3-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 10:21:57AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > > > I believe proper fix is to modify get_scan_count. IOW, I think > > > we should introduce lruvec_reclaimable_lru_size with proper > > > classzone_idx but I don't know how we can fix it with memcg > > > which doesn't have zone stat now. should introduce zone stat > > > back to memcg? Or, it's okay to ignore memcg? > > > > > > > I think it's ok to ignore memcg in this case as a memcg shrink is often > > going to be for pages that can use highmem anyway. > > So, you mean it's okay to ignore kmemcg case? > If memcg guys agree it, I want to make get_scan_count consider > reclaimable lru size under the reclaim constraint, instead. > For now, I believe yet. My understanding is that the primary use cases for kmemcg is systems running large numbers of containers. It consider it extremely unlikely that large 32-bit systems are being used for large numbers of containers and require usage of kmemcg. -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC] mm: bail out in shrin_inactive_list Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> - 2016-07-25 10:00 +0200
Re: [RFC] mm: bail out in shrin_inactive_list Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> - 2016-07-25 11:30 +0200
Re: [RFC] mm: bail out in shrin_inactive_list Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> - 2016-07-26 03:30 +0200
Re: [RFC] mm: bail out in shrin_inactive_list Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> - 2016-07-26 09:50 +0200
Re: [RFC] mm: bail out in shrin_inactive_list Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> - 2016-07-26 10:30 +0200
Re: [RFC] mm: bail out in shrin_inactive_list Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> - 2016-07-29 16:20 +0200
Re: [RFC] mm: bail out in shrin_inactive_list Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> - 2016-08-02 01:50 +0200
csiph-web