Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1449931

Re: [GIT PULL] perf changes for v4.8

From Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [GIT PULL] perf changes for v4.8
Date 2016-07-25 23:30 +0200
Message-ID <rYVBM-1gH-39@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rYJqV-2gM-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <rYOAh-5eA-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <rYPPH-6aR-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <rYQ93-6hx-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hi Ingo,

On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 17:35:36 +0200 Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > * Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >   
> > > Hi Ingo,
> > > 
> > > On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 10:28:38 +0200 Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:  
> > > >
> > > >       tools: Copy the bitops files accessed from the kernel and check for drift  
> > > 
> > > I think this has some needs some fixes for build breakage in linux-next ...  
> > 
> > Only if combined with a single pending change from the luto-next tree, right?  
> 
> ... which commits come through the x86 tree, so there's no way for Linus to be 
> exposed to that, right?
> 
> That is why I sent this without mentioning the conflict. Is there any other 
> complication that I missed?

Actually, the perf tree on its own was enough to trigger the build
problem, the luto-next tree was just what initially triggered the build
failure in linux-next (I guess there is some missing dependency).
After the build failed, I started including the perf tree directly
before the tip tree and the build would fail when I merged that ...

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [GIT PULL] perf changes for v4.8 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-07-25 16:00 +0200
  Re: [GIT PULL] perf changes for v4.8 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-07-25 17:00 +0200
  Re: [GIT PULL] perf changes for v4.8 Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-07-25 17:20 +0200
    Re: [GIT PULL] perf changes for v4.8 Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-07-25 17:40 +0200
      Re: [GIT PULL] perf changes for v4.8 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-07-25 23:30 +0200
        Re: [GIT PULL] perf changes for v4.8 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-07-25 23:50 +0200
          Re: [GIT PULL] perf changes for v4.8 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-07-26 00:10 +0200
            Re: [GIT PULL] perf changes for v4.8 Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-07-26 08:40 +0200
              Re: [GIT PULL] perf changes for v4.8 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-07-26 23:50 +0200
        Re: [GIT PULL] perf changes for v4.8 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-07-26 00:00 +0200
          Re: [GIT PULL] perf changes for v4.8 Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-07-26 08:50 +0200

csiph-web