Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1449699
| From | Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the tip tree |
| Date | 2016-07-25 20:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rYSkx-7wc-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rYkiR-3Tz-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rYIlb-1ER-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rYNXA-51i-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <rYPwm-5P2-37@gated-at.bofh.it> <rYReO-6TV-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 05:42:09PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 10:53:37AM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 03:11:48PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > > > > I don't know the goal of adding those patches in linux-next via your > > > tree, may be you misunderstood how linux-next works and you should > > > remove them. But if the purpose was to merge the patches, I remind you > > > that being an arch maintainer does not give you the right to apply any > > > patches, everywhere, at all cost, without review, because you want them > > > in, you must follow the process, otherwise you take the risk to upset a > > > lot of people and to be kicked out. > > > If this is upsetting people I can remove them. Last time I got > > feedback from at least one (driver) subsystem maintainer that (if I > > understood it correctly) indicated they would like to have seen the > > patch in linux-next without problems before upstreaming it through > > I think that was me and you've very much misunderstood what I was > saying. A that time you were sending new drivers during the merge > window with the apparent expectation that they would be merged during > that merge window. That's not going to happen, things need to go into > -next before the merge window. This means that you need to submit your > patches well in advance of the merge window so they can be reviewed and > ideally applied to maintainer trees before the merge window opens. > > It does not mean that you should include unreviewed code for other trees > in your -next tree, that's not the purpose of -next. What goes into > -next from each maintainer tree should be what is currently intended to > go to Linus for that tree in the next merge window. OK, thanks for the clarification. I'll remove the drivers from my for-next branch. Rich
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
linux-next: build warning after merge of the tip tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-07-24 07:40 +0200
Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the tip tree Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-07-25 09:20 +0200
Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the tip tree Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> - 2016-07-25 15:20 +0200
Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the tip tree Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> - 2016-07-25 17:00 +0200
Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the tip tree Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-07-25 18:50 +0200
Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the tip tree Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> - 2016-07-25 20:00 +0200
Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the tip tree Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> - 2016-07-25 17:00 +0200
csiph-web