Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1448323

Re: Question about group scheduler cpu shares

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu, 2016-07-21 at 18:18 -0700, Gaurav Poothia wrote:

> > ROOT
> > > 
> > + -Group1(3072)
> > >    |
> > >   +- A(2048)
> > >    |
> > >    +- B(1024)
> > > 
> > +- Group2(2048)
> >      |
> >      +-C(1024)
> >      |
> >      +-D(1024)
> > 

> > Say I add a task E to Group1's task list (note that is an interior aka
> > non-leaf node)
> > How does the CPU split change between A, B and E.
> > AFAICT there is no cgroup cpu subsystem knob to weight tasks on an
> > interior node against the tasks in that node's children

A, B and E are all entities with a weight, so just plug E into your
graph.  Its weight is determined by nice level, which is what cgroups
should have done instead of inventing shares IMHO.  1024 == nice(0).

	-Mike

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Question about group scheduler cpu shares Gaurav Poothia <gaurav.poothia@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 21:10 +0200
  Re: Question about group scheduler cpu shares Gaurav Poothia <gaurav.poothia@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 03:20 +0200
    Re: Question about group scheduler cpu shares Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 05:00 +0200
      Re: Question about group scheduler cpu shares Gaurav Poothia <gaurav.poothia@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 05:30 +0200
        Re: Question about group scheduler cpu shares Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 06:20 +0200

csiph-web