Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1448179
| From | Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | [PATCH 08/19] x86/dumpstack: don't disable preemption in show_stack_log_lvl() and dump_trace() |
| Date | 2016-07-21 23:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rXtHA-4Eb-27@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rXtHz-4Eb-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
show_stack_log_lvl() and dump_trace() are already preemption safe:
- If they're running in irq or exception context, preemption is already
disabled, and the percpu irq stack pointers can be trusted.
- If they're running with preemption enabled, they must be running on
the task stack anyway, so it doesn't matter if they're comparing the
stack pointer against the percpu irq stack pointer from this CPU or
another one: either way it won't match.
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c | 14 ++++++--------
arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c | 29 ++++++++++-------------------
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c
index c533b8b..b07d5c9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c
@@ -24,16 +24,16 @@ static void *is_irq_stack(void *p, void *irq)
}
-static void *is_hardirq_stack(unsigned long *stack, int cpu)
+static void *is_hardirq_stack(unsigned long *stack)
{
- void *irq = per_cpu(hardirq_stack, cpu);
+ void *irq = this_cpu_read(hardirq_stack);
return is_irq_stack(stack, irq);
}
-static void *is_softirq_stack(unsigned long *stack, int cpu)
+static void *is_softirq_stack(unsigned long *stack);
{
- void *irq = per_cpu(softirq_stack, cpu);
+ void *irq = this_cpu_read(softirq_stack);
return is_irq_stack(stack, irq);
}
@@ -42,7 +42,6 @@ void dump_trace(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
unsigned long *stack, unsigned long bp,
const struct stacktrace_ops *ops, void *data)
{
- const unsigned cpu = get_cpu();
int graph = 0;
u32 *prev_esp;
@@ -53,9 +52,9 @@ void dump_trace(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
for (;;) {
void *end_stack;
- end_stack = is_hardirq_stack(stack, cpu);
+ end_stack = is_hardirq_stack(stack);
if (!end_stack)
- end_stack = is_softirq_stack(stack, cpu);
+ end_stack = is_softirq_stack(stack);
bp = ops->walk_stack(task, stack, bp, ops, data,
end_stack, &graph);
@@ -74,7 +73,6 @@ void dump_trace(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
break;
touch_nmi_watchdog();
}
- put_cpu();
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(dump_trace);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
index 6a2d14e..634ed22 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
@@ -31,8 +31,8 @@ static char x86_stack_ids[][8] = {
#endif
};
-static unsigned long *in_exception_stack(unsigned cpu, unsigned long stack,
- unsigned *usedp, char **idp)
+static unsigned long *in_exception_stack(unsigned long stack, unsigned *usedp,
+ char **idp)
{
unsigned k;
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static unsigned long *in_exception_stack(unsigned cpu, unsigned long stack,
* 'stack' is in one of them:
*/
for (k = 0; k < N_EXCEPTION_STACKS; k++) {
- unsigned long end = per_cpu(orig_ist, cpu).ist[k];
+ unsigned long end = this_cpu_ptr(&orig_ist)->ist[k];
/*
* Is 'stack' above this exception frame's end?
* If yes then skip to the next frame.
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ enum stack_type {
};
static enum stack_type
-analyze_stack(int cpu, struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *stack,
+analyze_stack(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *stack,
unsigned long **stack_end, unsigned long *irq_stack,
unsigned *used, char **id)
{
@@ -121,8 +121,7 @@ analyze_stack(int cpu, struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *stack,
if ((unsigned long)task_stack_page(task) == addr)
return STACK_IS_NORMAL;
- *stack_end = in_exception_stack(cpu, (unsigned long)stack,
- used, id);
+ *stack_end = in_exception_stack((unsigned long)stack, used, id);
if (*stack_end)
return STACK_IS_EXCEPTION;
@@ -149,8 +148,7 @@ void dump_trace(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
unsigned long *stack, unsigned long bp,
const struct stacktrace_ops *ops, void *data)
{
- const unsigned cpu = get_cpu();
- unsigned long *irq_stack = (unsigned long *)per_cpu(irq_stack_ptr, cpu);
+ unsigned long *irq_stack = (unsigned long *)this_cpu_read(irq_stack_ptr);
unsigned used = 0;
int graph = 0;
int done = 0;
@@ -169,8 +167,8 @@ void dump_trace(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
enum stack_type stype;
char *id;
- stype = analyze_stack(cpu, task, stack, &stack_end,
- irq_stack, &used, &id);
+ stype = analyze_stack(task, stack, &stack_end, irq_stack, &used,
+ &id);
/* Default finish unless specified to continue */
done = 1;
@@ -225,7 +223,6 @@ void dump_trace(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
* This handles the process stack:
*/
bp = ops->walk_stack(task, stack, bp, ops, data, NULL, &graph);
- put_cpu();
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(dump_trace);
@@ -236,15 +233,10 @@ show_stack_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
unsigned long *irq_stack_end;
unsigned long *irq_stack;
unsigned long *stack;
- int cpu;
int i;
- preempt_disable();
- cpu = smp_processor_id();
-
- irq_stack_end = (unsigned long *)(per_cpu(irq_stack_ptr, cpu));
- irq_stack = (unsigned long *)(per_cpu(irq_stack_ptr, cpu) -
- IRQ_USABLE_STACK_SIZE);
+ irq_stack_end = (unsigned long *)this_cpu_read(irq_stack_ptr);
+ irq_stack = irq_stack_end - IRQ_USABLE_STACK_SIZE;
sp = sp ? : get_stack_pointer(task, regs);
@@ -275,7 +267,6 @@ show_stack_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
stack++;
touch_nmi_watchdog();
}
- preempt_enable();
pr_cont("\n");
show_trace_log_lvl(task, regs, sp, bp, log_lvl);
--
2.7.4
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 00/19] x86/dumpstack: rewrite x86 stack dump code Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-07-21 23:30 +0200
[PATCH 05/19] x86/dumpstack: fix function graph tracing stack dump reliability issues Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-07-21 23:30 +0200
[PATCH 04/19] x86/dumpstack: make printk_stack_address() more generally useful Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-07-21 23:30 +0200
[PATCH 18/19] x86/dumpstack: print stack identifier on its own line Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-07-21 23:30 +0200
[PATCH 13/19] x86/stacktrace: convert save_stack_trace_*() to the new unwinder Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-07-21 23:30 +0200
[PATCH 19/19] x86/dumpstack: print any pt_regs found on the stack Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-07-21 23:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 19/19] x86/dumpstack: print any pt_regs found on the stack Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-07-22 00:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 19/19] x86/dumpstack: print any pt_regs found on the stack Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-07-22 05:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 19/19] x86/dumpstack: print any pt_regs found on the stack Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-07-22 07:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 19/19] x86/dumpstack: print any pt_regs found on the stack Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-07-22 18:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 19/19] x86/dumpstack: print any pt_regs found on the stack Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-07-22 23:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 19/19] x86/dumpstack: print any pt_regs found on the stack Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-07-23 00:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 19/19] x86/dumpstack: print any pt_regs found on the stack Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-07-23 01:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 19/19] x86/dumpstack: print any pt_regs found on the stack Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-07-23 01:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 19/19] x86/dumpstack: print any pt_regs found on the stack Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-07-23 02:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 19/19] x86/dumpstack: print any pt_regs found on the stack Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-07-23 01:40 +0200
[PATCH 08/19] x86/dumpstack: don't disable preemption in show_stack_log_lvl() and dump_trace() Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-07-21 23:30 +0200
[PATCH 14/19] oprofile/x86: convert x86_backtrace() to the new unwinder Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-07-21 23:30 +0200
[PATCH 06/19] x86/dumpstack: remove extra brackets around "EOE" Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-07-21 23:30 +0200
[PATCH 10/19] x86/dumpstack: add get_stack_info() interface Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-07-21 23:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 10/19] x86/dumpstack: add get_stack_info() interface Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-07-23 01:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 10/19] x86/dumpstack: add get_stack_info() interface Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-07-23 02:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 10/19] x86/dumpstack: add get_stack_info() interface Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-07-23 15:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 10/19] x86/dumpstack: add get_stack_info() interface Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-07-23 02:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 10/19] x86/dumpstack: add get_stack_info() interface Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-07-23 02:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 10/19] x86/dumpstack: add get_stack_info() interface Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-07-23 16:10 +0200
[PATCH 01/19] x86/dumpstack: remove show_trace() Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-07-21 23:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 01/19] x86/dumpstack: remove show_trace() Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-07-22 00:00 +0200
[PATCH 12/19] perf/x86: convert perf_callchain_kernel() to the new unwinder Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-07-21 23:30 +0200
[PATCH 02/19] x86/dumpstack: add get_stack_pointer() and get_frame_pointer() Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-07-21 23:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 02/19] x86/dumpstack: add get_stack_pointer() and get_frame_pointer() Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-07-22 00:00 +0200
[PATCH 11/19] x86/dumptrace: add new unwind interface and implementations Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-07-21 23:30 +0200
[PATCH 09/19] x86/dumpstack: simplify in_exception_stack() Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-07-21 23:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 09/19] x86/dumpstack: simplify in_exception_stack() Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-07-22 00:10 +0200
[PATCH 07/19] x86/dumpstack: add IRQ_USABLE_STACK_SIZE define Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-07-21 23:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 07/19] x86/dumpstack: add IRQ_USABLE_STACK_SIZE define Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-07-22 00:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 07/19] x86/dumpstack: add IRQ_USABLE_STACK_SIZE define Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-07-22 03:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 07/19] x86/dumpstack: add IRQ_USABLE_STACK_SIZE define Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-07-22 10:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 00/19] x86/dumpstack: rewrite x86 stack dump code Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-07-23 02:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 00/19] x86/dumpstack: rewrite x86 stack dump code Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-07-23 02:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 00/19] x86/dumpstack: rewrite x86 stack dump code Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-07-23 07:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 00/19] x86/dumpstack: rewrite x86 stack dump code Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-07-23 07:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 00/19] x86/dumpstack: rewrite x86 stack dump code Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-07-23 15:00 +0200
csiph-web