Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1447628
| From | John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2 v3] security: Add task_settimerslack/task_gettimerslack LSM hook |
| Date | 2016-07-21 08:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rXfbA-3i0-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rWnbb-2v5-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rWnbb-2v5-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rWT1o-6cr-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:12 PM, James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> wrote: > On Mon, 18 Jul 2016, John Stultz wrote: > >> As requested, this patch implements a task_settimerslack and >> task_gettimerslack LSM hooks so that the /proc/<tid>/timerslack_ns >> interface can have finer grained security policies applied to it. >> >> I've kept the CAP_SYS_NICE check in the timerslack_ns_write/show >> functions, as hiding it in the LSM hook seems too opaque, and doesn't >> seem like a widely enough adopted practice. >> > > I may have missed something in the earlier discussion, but why do we need > new LSM hooks here vs. calling the existing set/getscheduler hooks? Mostly since adding a new hook was suggested originally. I don't think there's much difference as it stands, but I guess more fine grained checks could be added on the slack amounts, etc. I can rework it, so let me know if using the existing hooks would be preferred, but otherwise I'll be sending out the non-rfc patches tomorrow. thanks -john
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC][PATCH 1/2 v3] proc: Relax /proc/<tid>/timerslack_ns capability requirements John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> - 2016-07-18 22:20 +0200
[RFC][PATCH 2/2 v3] security: Add task_settimerslack/task_gettimerslack LSM hook John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> - 2016-07-18 22:20 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2 v3] security: Add task_settimerslack/task_gettimerslack LSM hook "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com> - 2016-07-18 22:30 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2 v3] security: Add task_settimerslack/task_gettimerslack LSM hook Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2016-07-18 22:50 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2 v3] security: Add task_settimerslack/task_gettimerslack LSM hook James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> - 2016-07-20 08:20 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2 v3] security: Add task_settimerslack/task_gettimerslack LSM hook John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> - 2016-07-21 08:00 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2 v3] security: Add task_settimerslack/task_gettimerslack LSM hook James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> - 2016-07-21 13:50 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2 v3] proc: Relax /proc/<tid>/timerslack_ns capability requirements "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com> - 2016-07-18 22:30 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2 v3] proc: Relax /proc/<tid>/timerslack_ns capability requirements Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2016-07-18 22:50 +0200
csiph-web