Re: [PATCH] clk: probe common clock drivers earlier

From	Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH] clk: probe common clock drivers earlier
Date	2016-07-21 03:10 +0200
Message-ID	<rXaEV-yP-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<rvmmt-3Sg-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rVnmW-6qg-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <rVpRM-7Mr-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <rWXol-jn-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

2016-07-20 19:58 GMT+09:00 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>:
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 6:57 AM, Masahiro Yamada
> <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> wrote:
>> 2016-07-16 11:11 GMT+09:00 Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>:
>>> Quoting Masahiro Yamada (2016-05-05 00:57:17)
>>>> Several SoCs implement platform drivers for clocks rather than
>>>> CLK_OF_DECLARE().  Clocks should come earlier because they are
>>>> prerequisites for many of other drivers.  It will help to mitigate
>
> As are regulators, DMA engines, power domains, ..., but the actual ordering
> needed depends on the SoC.


Right.


The *mitigate* is a keyword in my git-log.

I am not saying this commit can completely suppress EPROBE_DEFER,
but moving "obj-y += clk/" up is
a right thing for *most* of SoCs.


-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH] clk: probe common clock drivers earlier Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com> - 2016-07-16 04:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] clk: probe common clock drivers earlier Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> - 2016-07-16 07:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] clk: probe common clock drivers earlier Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2016-07-20 13:00 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] clk: probe common clock drivers earlier Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> - 2016-07-21 03:10 +0200

csiph-web