Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1448659
| From | Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: RFC: silencing kvm unimplemented msr spew. |
| Date | 2016-07-22 18:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rXLbr-80C-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <rWiEy-7XO-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <rWJOq-ca-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <rWJOq-ca-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <rXt4R-47W-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <rXEjE-3pq-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> writes: ... >> Yeah, that's close. Though I would have done the same for the other side of >> the if's too. >> (Still evaluating which mode is actually more useful for us). > > For Linux guests, there should be no reason to use ignore_msrs. Linux > is pretty resilient to "missing" MSRs (especially because they are already > ignored if the kernel is compiled with CONFIG_PARAVIRT=y!). The option is > really more for Windows, because it doesn't have anything like CONFIG_PARAVIRT > and because drivers are sometimes less vetted (and sometimes do RDMSR > themselves for whatever reason). In general we try to look at beta versions > of Windows and add any required MSRs well before the final release date, > but if you're using old kernels you might be stuck with ignore_msrs. > > IOW, if there was a really common reason to use ignore_msrs it would be > the default. ;) > >> Paolo, would you prefer this, or the other approach you already ack'd ? > > I think I prefer the other, because vcpu_debug is not ratelimited. > If the guest can trigger a printk it should always be ratelimited. Agree with rate limiting, but making this the default for everything doesn't sound right IMO, especially for ignore_msrs=1. vcpu_unimpl is already rate limited. Or is this change specifically to suppress messages on ignore_msrs=1 ? > Paolo > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: RFC: silencing kvm unimplemented msr spew. Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2016-07-18 17:30 +0200
Re: RFC: silencing kvm unimplemented msr spew. Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com> - 2016-07-19 22:30 +0200
Re: RFC: silencing kvm unimplemented msr spew. Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com> - 2016-07-21 22:50 +0200
Re: RFC: silencing kvm unimplemented msr spew. Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2016-07-22 10:50 +0200
Re: RFC: silencing kvm unimplemented msr spew. Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com> - 2016-07-22 18:10 +0200
Re: RFC: silencing kvm unimplemented msr spew. Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2016-07-22 18:30 +0200
Re: RFC: silencing kvm unimplemented msr spew. Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com> - 2016-07-22 18:40 +0200
Re: RFC: silencing kvm unimplemented msr spew. Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2016-07-20 00:20 +0200
csiph-web