Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1448480
| From | Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | mm/compact: why use low watermark to determine whether compact is finished instead of use high watermark? |
| Date | 2016-07-22 11:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rXED0-3Mr-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi, I find all the watermarks in mm/compaction.c are low_wmark_pages(), so why not use high watermark to determine whether compact is finished? e.g. __alloc_pages_nodemask() get_page_from_freelist() this is fast path, use use low_wmark_pages() in __zone_watermark_ok() __alloc_pages_slowpath() this is slow path, usually use min_wmark_pages() kswapd balance_pgdat() use high_wmark_pages() to determine whether zone is balanced Thanks, Xishi Qiu
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
mm/compact: why use low watermark to determine whether compact is finished instead of use high watermark? Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com> - 2016-07-22 11:10 +0200
Re: mm/compact: why use low watermark to determine whether compact is finished instead of use high watermark? Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2016-07-22 11:10 +0200
Re: mm/compact: why use low watermark to determine whether compact is finished instead of use high watermark? Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com> - 2016-07-22 11:40 +0200
Re: mm/compact: why use low watermark to determine whether compact is finished instead of use high watermark? Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2016-07-22 11:40 +0200
csiph-web