Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1445841

Re: [PATCH v8 2/4] i2c-smbus: add SMBus Host Notify support

From Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v8 2/4] i2c-smbus: add SMBus Host Notify support
Date 2016-07-18 22:50 +0200
Message-ID <rWnEe-2HJ-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rI9B7-7JN-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rI9B8-7JN-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <rWhSa-7qj-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <rWjKh-bB-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization SUSE Linux

Show all headers | View raw


On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 18:35:19 +0200, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> On Jul 18 2016 or thereabouts, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > But what happens on i2c_adapter removal? What prevents the following
> > sequence from happening?
> > 
> > 1* A Host Notify event happens.
> > 2* The event is handled and queued by i2c_handle_smbus_host_notify().
> > 3* Someone tears down the underlying i2c_adapter (for example "rmmod
> >    i2c-i801".)
> > 4* The workqueue is processed, accessing memory which has already been
> >    freed.
> > 
> > Of course it would be back luck, but that's pretty much the definition
> > of a race condition ;-)
> 
> Yes, you are right :(
> Sorry for not doing things properly :/

No worry. Bugs happen everywhere, we find them and fix them. That's
part of the process. If we only submit patches which we are 100%
certain are perfect, we never submit anything. I know something about
that...

> > To be on the safe side, don't we need a teardown function in i2c-smbus,
> > that could be called before i2c_del_adapter, which would remove the
> > host notify handle and flush the workqueue?
> 
> I was thinking at adding a devm action on the release of the struct
> smbus_host_notify, but it's actually a bad idea because some other
> resources (children moslty) might already be released when the devres
> action will be called.
> 
> I think it might be easier to add a i2c_remove_host_notify() (or such)
> which would make sure we call the cancel_work_sync() function. It would
> be the responsibility of the caller to call it once
> i2c_setup_smbus_host_notify() has been called. I'd say it has the
> advantage of not adding any hidden data in the adapter to the cost of a
> small pain in the adapter driver.

That's what I had in mind as well, but I'm open to any option which
solves the problem really.

-- 
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH v8 2/4] i2c-smbus: add SMBus Host Notify support Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> - 2016-07-18 16:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v8 2/4] i2c-smbus: add SMBus Host Notify support Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> - 2016-07-18 18:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v8 2/4] i2c-smbus: add SMBus Host Notify support Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> - 2016-07-18 22:50 +0200

csiph-web