Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1445841
| From | Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v8 2/4] i2c-smbus: add SMBus Host Notify support |
| Date | 2016-07-18 22:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rWnEe-2HJ-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rI9B7-7JN-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rI9B8-7JN-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <rWhSa-7qj-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <rWjKh-bB-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | SUSE Linux |
On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 18:35:19 +0200, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: > On Jul 18 2016 or thereabouts, Jean Delvare wrote: > > But what happens on i2c_adapter removal? What prevents the following > > sequence from happening? > > > > 1* A Host Notify event happens. > > 2* The event is handled and queued by i2c_handle_smbus_host_notify(). > > 3* Someone tears down the underlying i2c_adapter (for example "rmmod > > i2c-i801".) > > 4* The workqueue is processed, accessing memory which has already been > > freed. > > > > Of course it would be back luck, but that's pretty much the definition > > of a race condition ;-) > > Yes, you are right :( > Sorry for not doing things properly :/ No worry. Bugs happen everywhere, we find them and fix them. That's part of the process. If we only submit patches which we are 100% certain are perfect, we never submit anything. I know something about that... > > To be on the safe side, don't we need a teardown function in i2c-smbus, > > that could be called before i2c_del_adapter, which would remove the > > host notify handle and flush the workqueue? > > I was thinking at adding a devm action on the release of the struct > smbus_host_notify, but it's actually a bad idea because some other > resources (children moslty) might already be released when the devres > action will be called. > > I think it might be easier to add a i2c_remove_host_notify() (or such) > which would make sure we call the cancel_work_sync() function. It would > be the responsibility of the caller to call it once > i2c_setup_smbus_host_notify() has been called. I'd say it has the > advantage of not adding any hidden data in the adapter to the cost of a > small pain in the adapter driver. That's what I had in mind as well, but I'm open to any option which solves the problem really. -- Jean Delvare SUSE L3 Support
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v8 2/4] i2c-smbus: add SMBus Host Notify support Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> - 2016-07-18 16:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v8 2/4] i2c-smbus: add SMBus Host Notify support Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> - 2016-07-18 18:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v8 2/4] i2c-smbus: add SMBus Host Notify support Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> - 2016-07-18 22:50 +0200
csiph-web