Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1445689
| From | Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH RT 11/20] ARM: imx: always use TWD on IMX6Q |
| Date | 2016-07-18 20:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rWlj4-1gf-57@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rU6Rb-66R-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rU6Rc-66R-43@gated-at.bofh.it> <rUcae-1jn-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 07/12/2016 11:04 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > * Steven Rostedt | 2016-07-12 10:24:16 [-0400]: > >> 4.1.27-rt31-rc1 stable review patch. >> If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > I don't recommend to cherry-pick this. The symbol it selects > (HAVE_ARM_TWD) has "depends on SMP" in v4.1. In v4.4 there should be > AM43xx which is UP and also uses the TWD so the change is simple here. > yes. AM43xx is UP and supports ARM TWD, but there could be some 'issues' in !RT case :( ARM TWD might be powered off in deep CPU Idle states and lose its context if !RT & CPUIDLE, so there are should be backup broadcast timer configured. And that can cause build issues related to tick_broadcast()->smp_cross_call(). I've solved it locally for OMAP2 only: commit 0b3e6fca4d1af4aa150d32506220f4241323a00c ^Just FYI. But may be it can be done in more generic way. regards, -grygorii
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH RT 11/20] ARM: imx: always use TWD on IMX6Q Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-07-12 16:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH RT 11/20] ARM: imx: always use TWD on IMX6Q Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> - 2016-07-12 22:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH RT 11/20] ARM: imx: always use TWD on IMX6Q Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-07-12 22:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH RT 11/20] ARM: imx: always use TWD on IMX6Q Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> - 2016-07-18 20:20 +0200
csiph-web