Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1446729

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net] e1000e: fix PTP on e1000_pch_lpt variants

From "Rustad, Mark D" <mark.d.rustad@intel.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net] e1000e: fix PTP on e1000_pch_lpt variants
Date 2016-07-19 22:50 +0200
Message-ID <rWK7L-kN-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rWJOq-ca-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com> wrote:

> I've got reports that the Intel I-218V NIC in Intel NUC5i5RYH systems used
> as a PTP slave experiences random ~10 hour clock jumps, which are resolved
> if the same workaround for the 82574 and 82583 is employed. Switching from
> an if to a select, because the list of NIC types could well grow further
> and we'd already have to wrap the conditionals.
>
> CC: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
> CC: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
> CC: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 8 +++++++-
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c  
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> index 2b2e2f8..866fea0 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> @@ -4335,7 +4335,10 @@ static cycle_t e1000e_cyclecounter_read(const  
> struct cyclecounter *cc)
>  	systim = (cycle_t)systimel;
>  	systim |= (cycle_t)systimeh << 32;
>
> -	if ((hw->mac.type == e1000_82574) || (hw->mac.type == e1000_82583)) {
> +	switch (hw->mac.type) {
> +	case e1000_82574:
> +	case e1000_82583:
> +	case e1000_pch_lpt:
>  		u64 time_delta, rem, temp;
>  		u32 incvalue;
>  		int i;

I don't think that it is acceptable to declare local variables inside a  
switch statement quite like this. At a minimum, a new block needs to be  
opened to allow the declarations.

> @@ -4360,6 +4363,9 @@ static cycle_t e1000e_cyclecounter_read(const  
> struct cyclecounter *cc)
>  			    (rem == 0))
>  				break;
>  		}
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		break;
>  	}
>  	return systim;
>  }

--
Mark Rustad, Networking Division, Intel Corporation

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH net] e1000e: fix PTP on e1000_pch_lpt variants Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com> - 2016-07-19 22:30 +0200
  Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net] e1000e: fix PTP on e1000_pch_lpt  variants "Rustad, Mark D" <mark.d.rustad@intel.com> - 2016-07-19 22:50 +0200
    Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net] e1000e: fix PTP on e1000_pch_lpt  variants Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com> - 2016-07-20 19:10 +0200
  Re: [PATCH net] e1000e: fix PTP on e1000_pch_lpt variants Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> - 2016-07-20 13:10 +0200
  [PATCH net-next 1/2] e1000e: factor out systim sanitization Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com> - 2016-07-23 18:50 +0200
  [PATCH v2 net-next 0/2] e1000e: fix PTP on e1000_pch_variants Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com> - 2016-07-23 18:50 +0200
    [PATCH net-next 2/2] e1000e: fix PTP on e1000_pch_lpt variants Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com> - 2016-07-23 18:50 +0200
    Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2 net-next 0/2] e1000e: fix PTP on  e1000_pch_variants Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com> - 2016-07-25 20:00 +0200

csiph-web