Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1444558
| From | Nick Kralevich <nnk@google.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2 v2] proc: Relax /proc/<tid>/timerslack_ns capability requirements |
| Date | 2016-07-15 22:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rVhUe-2YB-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rVf62-1fR-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <rVhrc-2zQ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rVhAR-2Sc-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 1:03 PM, John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Nick Kralevich <nnk@google.com> wrote: >> This should also have a similar LSM check for reads. For the SELinux >> implementation, this can map to the PROCESS__GETSCHED permission. > > Ok. I'll wire that in as well. > > Would adding both selinux_task_get and set methods in the same patch > be ok? Or would folks prefer they be split into two? I would prefer 1 patch. -- Nick Kralevich | Android Security | nnk@google.com | 650.214.4037
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC][PATCH 1/2 v2] proc: Relax /proc/<tid>/timerslack_ns capability requirements John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> - 2016-07-15 19:30 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2 v2] proc: Relax /proc/<tid>/timerslack_ns capability requirements Nick Kralevich <nnk@google.com> - 2016-07-15 20:00 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2 v2] proc: Relax /proc/<tid>/timerslack_ns capability requirements John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> - 2016-07-15 20:50 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2 v2] proc: Relax /proc/<tid>/timerslack_ns capability requirements Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2016-07-15 21:00 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2 v2] proc: Relax /proc/<tid>/timerslack_ns capability requirements Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> - 2016-07-15 22:20 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2 v2] proc: Relax /proc/<tid>/timerslack_ns capability requirements Nick Kralevich <nnk@google.com> - 2016-07-15 22:00 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2 v2] proc: Relax /proc/<tid>/timerslack_ns capability requirements John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> - 2016-07-15 22:10 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2 v2] proc: Relax /proc/<tid>/timerslack_ns capability requirements Nick Kralevich <nnk@google.com> - 2016-07-15 22:30 +0200
csiph-web