Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1442792

Re: [PATCH V7 6/9] vfio: platform: call _RST method when using ACPI

Show all headers | View raw

On 6/23/2016 2:59 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 00:26:38 -0400
> Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> 
>> The device tree code checks for the presence of a reset driver and calls
>> the of_reset function pointer by looking up the reset driver as a module.
>>
>> ACPI defines _RST method to perform device level reset. After the _RST
>> method is executed, the OS can resume using the device. _RST method is
>> expected to stop DMA transfers and IRQs.
>>
>> This patch introduces two functions as vfio_platform_acpi_has_reset and
>> vfio_platform_acpi_call_reset. The has reset method is used to declare
>> reset capability via the ioctl flag VFIO_DEVICE_FLAGS_RESET. The call
>> reset function is used to execute the _RST ACPI method.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 51 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
>> index e7ce2c2..0ea8c26 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
>> @@ -73,21 +73,66 @@ static int vfio_platform_acpi_probe(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev,
>>  	}
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>> +
>> +static int vfio_platform_acpi_call_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev,
>> +					 const char **extra_dbg)
>> +{
>> +	struct device *dev = vdev->device;
>> +	acpi_handle handle = ACPI_HANDLE(dev);
>> +	acpi_status acpi_ret;
>> +	unsigned long long val;
>> +
>> +	acpi_ret = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_RST", NULL, &val);
>> +	if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_ret)) {
>> +		if (extra_dbg)
>> +			*extra_dbg = acpi_format_exception(acpi_ret);
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool vfio_platform_acpi_has_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
>> +{
>> +	struct device *dev = vdev->device;
>> +	acpi_handle handle = ACPI_HANDLE(dev);
>> +
>> +	return acpi_has_method(handle, "_RST");
>> +}
>>  #else
>>  static inline int vfio_platform_acpi_probe(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev,
>>  					   struct device *dev)
>>  {
>>  	return -ENOENT;
>>  }
>> +
>> +static inline
>> +int vfio_platform_acpi_call_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev,
>> +				  const char **extra_dbg)
>> +{
>> +	return -ENOENT;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline
>> +bool vfio_platform_acpi_has_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
>> +{
>> +	return false;
>> +}
>>  #endif
>>  
>>  static bool vfio_platform_has_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
>>  {
>> +	if (vdev->acpihid)
>> +		return vfio_platform_acpi_has_reset(vdev);
>> +
>>  	return vdev->of_reset ? true : false;
>>  }
>>  
>>  static void vfio_platform_get_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
>>  {
>> +	if (vdev->acpihid)
>> +		return;
>> +
>>  	vdev->of_reset = vfio_platform_lookup_reset(vdev->compat,
>>  						    &vdev->reset_module);
>>  	if (!vdev->of_reset) {
>> @@ -99,6 +144,9 @@ static void vfio_platform_get_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
>>  
>>  static void vfio_platform_put_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
>>  {
>> +	if (vdev->acpihid)
>> +		return;
>> +
>>  	if (vdev->of_reset)
>>  		module_put(vdev->reset_module);
>>  }
>> @@ -177,6 +225,9 @@ static int vfio_platform_call_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev,
>>  	if (vdev->of_reset) {
>>  		dev_info(vdev->device, "reset\n");
>>  		return vdev->of_reset(vdev);
>> +	} else if (vdev->acpihid) {
>> +		dev_info(vdev->device, "reset\n");
>> +		return vfio_platform_acpi_call_reset(vdev, extra_dbg);
> 
> 
> nit, all the cases until this one prioritize ACPI over DT, here we have
> the opposite. 

I'll reorder to be consistent.

> Granted we should never have of_reset set when acpihid
> is set.  A macro like
> 
> #define vfio_platform_is_acpi(vdev) (vdev->acpihid != NULL)
> 
> might be useful.

I like your idea. If you don't mind, I like capitals in macros. 

> 
> 
>>  	}
>>  
>>  	dev_warn(vdev->device, "no reset function found!\n");
> 


-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH V7 6/9] vfio: platform: call _RST method when using ACPI Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> - 2016-07-13 21:50 +0200
  Re: [PATCH V7 6/9] vfio: platform: call _RST method when using ACPI Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> - 2016-07-13 22:20 +0200

csiph-web