Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1442435
| From | Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add a kexec_crash_loaded() function |
| Date | 2016-07-13 15:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rUs5k-3uO-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rUrsB-30I-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rUrsC-30I-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <rUrVE-3bS-27@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | SUSE Linux |
On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 05:52:33 -0700
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 02:19:55PM +0200, Petr Tesarik wrote:
> > --- a/kernel/kexec_core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/kexec_core.c
> > @@ -95,6 +95,12 @@ int kexec_should_crash(struct task_struct *p)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +int kexec_crash_loaded(void)
> > +{
> > + return !!kexec_crash_image;
> > +}
>
> Nit: this function should return bool rather than int, since it
> effectively returns true/false.
I thought about this for a moment. Since the return value should also
be used for the corresponding sysctl, which is an integer, I wasn't
sure if bool is the correct type, especially since other boolean
functions in kexec.h also return int... But that could be legacy.
I've got no problem changing the type to 'bool' if that's what it takes.
Petr T
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 1/2] Add a kexec_crash_loaded() function Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.com> - 2016-07-13 14:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add a kexec_crash_loaded() function Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> - 2016-07-13 15:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add a kexec_crash_loaded() function Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.com> - 2016-07-13 15:10 +0200
csiph-web